NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
0623T Preparation, transmission and computerized analysis of ct angiography data on plaque in heart arteries, with review, interpretation, and report HCPCS · CT Scan imaging
Classification Imaging CT Scan (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2023
National scale 1,895 services ▲ 2156.0% YoY · 1,883 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $2.3M · $1213.78 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
11
Named-group FFS services
656
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
+2156.0%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~1,471 services

656 observed fee-for-service (45%) · ~815 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 0623T (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$1.9M
Named-group allowed amount
$995K
Named-group Medicare payments
$792K
Avg charge / svc
$2,871
Avg allowed / svc
$1,517
Avg payment / svc
$1,207
Average charge per group
$1,500 11 groups · avg submitted charge / service $4,800
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 0623T services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 0623T svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 HEART CARE CFL PLLC TITUSVILLE FL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 3 209 $596,800 $2,856 premium 20.1%
2 RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF VENICE AND ENGLEWOOD PA VENICE FL DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 8 132 $422,400 $3,200 premium 12.7% (941) 486-3483
3 CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS PA ORLANDO FL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 4 96 $230,400 $2,400 premium 9.2% (407) 896-7899
4 CONNECTED CARDIOVASCULAR CARE ASSOCIATES, PLLC DALLAS TX INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY 6 67 $145,600 $2,173 premium 33.3% (214) 814-1550
5 ABKSW PREFERRED HEALTH PARTNERS, PLLC DALLAS TX INTERNAL MEDICINE 48 59 $236,000 $4,000 premium 29.4% (241) 823-4800
6 PALM DESERT RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC RANCHO MIRAGE CA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 125 24 $36,000 $1,500 premium 34.3% (760) 773-1251
7 CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF MOBILE INC MOBILE AL PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 52 17 $34,000 $2,000 premium 100.0% (251) 460-0078
8 CLEAR HEART-LOVELAND LLC LOVELAND CA CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 2 15 $28,800 $1,920 premium 21.4% (970) 900-1707
9 OUR LADY OF THE LAKE PHYSICIAN GROUP LLC BATON ROUGE LA NURSE PRACTITIONER 628 15 $72,000 $4,800 premium 11.6% (225) 765-1765
10 ABDUL ALI,M.D.P.A. HOUSTON TX CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 4 11 $52,800 $4,800 premium 5.5% (713) 464-4140
11 NEEL R. PATEL, M.D., PLC MAITLAND FL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 2 11 $28,853 $2,623 premium 1.1% (407) 790-7860

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →