NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
15793 Chemical peel of deep layer of nonfacial skin CPT · Skin procedure
Classification Procedure Skin (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 411 services ▼ 11.6% YoY · 283 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $135K · $327.66 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
8
Named-group FFS services
307
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-11.6%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~618 services

307 observed fee-for-service (50%) · ~311 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 15793 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$345K
Named-group allowed amount
$127K
Named-group Medicare payments
$100K
Avg charge / svc
$1,125
Avg allowed / svc
$414
Avg payment / svc
$324
Average charge per group
$808 8 groups · avg submitted charge / service $2,675
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 15793 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 15793 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 CALIFORNIA DERMATOLOGY INSTITUTE PC HUNTINGTON PARK CA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 19 112 $119,456 $1,067 premium 53.6% (888) 367-1850
2 ORANGE COAST DERMATOLOGY INC RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA DERMATOLOGY 3 78 $63,041 $808 premium 37.3% (949) 888-8500
3 NORTH SHORE-LIJ MEDICAL PC MANHASSET NY PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 6294 26 $69,550 $2,675 premium 100.0%
4 AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES PC MEDIA PA DERMATOLOGY 12 24 $24,000 $1,000 premium 100.0% (610) 566-7300
5 SWETHA KANDULA MD LLC PARSIPPANY NJ DERMATOLOGY 2 23 $24,865 $1,081 premium 100.0% (973) 658-7546
6 COUNTY OF VENTURA VENTURA CA FAMILY PRACTICE 279 19 $19,988 $1,052 premium 9.1% (805) 654-3306
7 NORTH ATLANTA DERMATOLOGY BUFORD GA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 17 13 $12,339 $949 premium 100.0% (770) 814-8222
8 NORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER, INC. TUPELO MS CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) 361 12 $12,048 $1,004 premium 100.0% (662) 377-3258

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →