NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
36015 Insertion of tube into artery of lobe of lung CPT · Vascular procedure
Classification Procedure Vascular (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 842 services ▲ 39.2% YoY · 336 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $63K · $74.97 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
10
Named-group FFS services
463
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
+39.2%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~919 services

463 observed fee-for-service (50%) · ~456 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 36015 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$769K
Named-group allowed amount
$43K
Named-group Medicare payments
$35K
Avg charge / svc
$1,661
Avg allowed / svc
$94
Avg payment / svc
$75
Average charge per group
$385 10 groups · avg submitted charge / service $5,376
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 36015 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 36015 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO CA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 2057 109 $456,165 $4,185 premium 100.0% (800) 926-8273
2 NORTHWESTERN MEDICAL FACULTY FOUNDATION CHICAGO IL NURSE PRACTITIONER 4339 83 $78,540 $946 premium 87.4%
3 RADIOLOGY OF HUNSTVILLE PC HUNTSVILLE AL DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 63 78 $53,237 $683 premium 100.0% 2565390457145
4 AHS OKLAHOMA HEART LLC TULSA OK PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 136 56 $21,560 $385 premium 100.0% (918) 592-0999
5 PRISMA HEALTH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL GROUP GREENVILLE SC NURSE PRACTITIONER 2447 43 $35,786 $832 premium 32.6%
6 LEXINGTON HEALTH INC WEST COLUMBIA SC NURSE PRACTITIONER 909 32 $25,776 $806 premium 24.2% (803) 744-4900
7 MUSC COMMUNITY PHYSICIANS ORANGEBURG SC NURSE PRACTITIONER 1307 27 $20,978 $777 premium 20.5% (803) 395-3400
8 SACRED HEART HEALTH SYSTEM INC PENSACOLA FL NURSE PRACTITIONER 371 12 $10,122 $844 premium 24.5% (850) 416-2400
9 UNIVERSITY PRIMARY CARE PRACTICES INC CONNEAUT OH FAMILY PRACTICE 1067 12 $7,900 $658 premium 12.1%
10 PROMEDICA NORTHWEST OHIO CARDIOLOGY CONSULTANTS LLC TOLEDO FL CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 79 11 $59,136 $5,376 premium 22.4% (419) 842-3000

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →