Medicare procedure market data by CPT code & state

+ Build a code basket

Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS

36589 Removal of tunneled central venous tube CPT · Vascular procedure

Classification Procedure › Vascular › Venous Catheter Insertion (CMS RBCS)

First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it

National scale 33,549 services ▼ 7.4% YoY · 32,603 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)

Medicare paid $4.2M · $125.55 avg / service, national

CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window

Billing groups

469

Named groups billing this code

Named-group FFS services

17,425

Attributable volume · fee-for-service

FFS of Medicare

49%

Payer-mix frame

Services · year over year

Services YoY

-7.4%

FFS enrollment -2.2%

Volume, not care. A shrinking fee-for-service denominator is not a shrinking market.

Estimated all-Medicare volume estimate

FFS + estimated MA

~35,316 services

17,425 observed fee-for-service (49%) · ~17,891 estimated Medicare Advantage.

Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 36589 (CY2024)

CA 4,386 TX 3,333 FL 2,537 NY 1,469 MD 1,319

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Billed → allowed → paid

Named-group submitted charges

$10.1M

Named-group allowed amount

$2.2M

Named-group Medicare payments

$1.7M

Avg charge / svc

$581

Avg allowed / svc

$127

Avg payment / svc

$98

Totals are named-group (attributable) sums. Allowed is Medicare’s fee-schedule recognized price — what CMS recognizes, before the 80% Medicare pays.

Average charge per group

$127–249

$249–370

$370–492

$492–614

$614–736

$736–858

$858–980

$980+

$127 469 groups · avg submitted charge / service $2,693

Market analyticsPlatform Methods →

Search a single state to see that market's full analytics — the free tier previews every panel, gated.

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 CY2021 CY2020

Physician groups ranked by 36589 services, highest first, CY2024
#	Physician group locked column	City locked column	St locked column	Specialty locked column	Providers locked column	36589 svcs	Submitted charges locked column	Avg charge locked column	Medicare $ locked column	Share* locked column	Phone
1	MAYO CLINIC	ROCHESTER	MN	NURSE PRACTITIONER	4896	375	$418,691	$1,117	premium	68.6%	(507) 284-2511
2	MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE	JACKSONVILLE	FL	NURSE PRACTITIONER	1587	256	$498,683	$1,948	premium	10.1%	(904) 953-2000
3	RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF NORTH TEXAS PA	FORT WORTH	TX	DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY	340	216	$133,020	$616	premium	6.5%	(817) 321-0470
4	AMERICAN ACCESS CARE PHYSICIAN PLLC	BROOKLYN	NY	INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY	17	177	$80,652	$456	premium	12.0%	(718) 369-1444
5	H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR AND RES INST LIFE TIME CANCER SCRN CTR INC	TAMPA	FL	PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT	1103	156	$73,166	$469	premium	6.1%	(813) 745-4673

That's the top 5 of 469 groups. The platform ranks the whole market — code baskets, benchmarks, and the full ranked list. the full ranking is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →