NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
36909 Permanent blockage of hemodialysis circuit with review by radiologist CPT · Vascular procedure
Classification Procedure › Vascular › A-V Fistula PCI (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2017
National scale 867 services ▼ 7.4% YoY · 728 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $827K · $954.01 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups

14

Named groups billing this code
Named-group all-Medicare svcs · est.

1,005

Scaled from 491 observed FFS services.
FFS of Medicare

49%

Payer-mix frame
Services · year over year
Services YoY

-3.1%

All-Medicare est. · observed FFS -7.4%
Volume, not care. A shrinking fee-for-service denominator is not a shrinking market.
Estimated all-Medicare volume estimate
FFS + estimated MA

~1,005 services

491 observed fee-for-service (49%) · ~514 estimated Medicare Advantage.

Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale
Top states — 36909 (CY2024)
NY 146 TX 108 FL 103 CA 88 NC 58

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Billed → allowed → paid
Named-group submitted charges
$1.9M
Named-group allowed amount
$694K
Named-group Medicare payments
$555K
Avg charge / svc
$3,838
Avg allowed / svc
$1,414
Avg payment / svc
$1,130
Totals are named-group (attributable) sums. Allowed is Medicare’s fee-schedule recognized price — what CMS recognizes, before the 80% Medicare pays.
Average charge per group
$500 14 groups · avg submitted charge / service $8,386
Market analyticsPlatform Methods →

Search a single state to see that market's full analytics — the free tier previews every panel, gated.

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →
Unlock the Platform — the full read, every number below, code baskets, and export. Looking is free; the depth is paid. Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022  CY2021  CY2020 
# Physician group City St Specialty Providers 36909 svcs Submitted charges Avg charge Medicare $ Share of state* Phone
1 AMERICAN ACCESS CARE PHYSICIAN PLLC BROOKLYN NY INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY 17 65 $352,410 $5,422 44.5% (718) 369-1444
2 AMERICAN ACCESS CARE OF MIAMI, LLC MIAMI FL VASCULAR SURGERY 6 51 $28,764 $564 49.5% (305) 670-1044
3 ARCHBOLD MEDICAL GROUP, INC. THOMASVILLE GA NURSE PRACTITIONER 79 43 $97,367 $2,264 100.0% (229) 228-5500
4 A AND V DOCTORS PLLC EL PASO TX INTERNAL MEDICINE 7 38 $210,900 $5,550 35.2% (915) 307-7800
5 MAKRISMD LLC WESTMONT IL CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) 6 32 $16,512 $516 100.0% (630) 323-8690
That's the top 5 of 14 groups. The platform ranks the whole market — code baskets, benchmarks, and the full ranked list. the full ranking is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →