NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
37239 Insertion of stent in vein with review by radiologist, each additional vein CPT · Vascular procedure
Classification Procedure › Vascular › Transvascular Stent (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2014
National scale 1,613 services ▲ 11.3% YoY · 1,061 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $1.8M · $1138.02 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups

21

Named groups billing this code
Named-group all-Medicare svcs · est.

2,244

Scaled from 1,178 observed FFS services.
FFS of Medicare

49%

Payer-mix frame
Services · year over year
Services YoY

+11.1%

All-Medicare est. · observed FFS +11.3%
Volume, not care. A shrinking fee-for-service denominator is not a shrinking market.
Estimated all-Medicare volume estimate
FFS + estimated MA

~2,244 services

1,178 observed fee-for-service (52%) · ~1,066 estimated Medicare Advantage.

Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale
Top states — 37239 (CY2024)
CA 320 MD 260 FL 235 MS 195 MI 162

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Billed → allowed → paid
Named-group submitted charges
$6.0M
Named-group allowed amount
$1.6M
Named-group Medicare payments
$1.3M
Avg charge / svc
$5,109
Avg allowed / svc
$1,349
Avg payment / svc
$1,080
Totals are named-group (attributable) sums. Allowed is Medicare’s fee-schedule recognized price — what CMS recognizes, before the 80% Medicare pays.
Average charge per group
$434 21 groups · avg submitted charge / service $20,652
Market analyticsPlatform Methods →

Search a single state to see that market's full analytics — the free tier previews every panel, gated.

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →
Unlock the Platform — the full read, every number below, code baskets, and export. Looking is free; the depth is paid. Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022  CY2021  CY2020 
# Physician group City St Specialty Providers 37239 svcs Submitted charges Avg charge Medicare $ Share of state* Phone
1 SESHADRI RAJU, M.D., PA. JACKSON MS NURSE PRACTITIONER 9 195 $1,576,575 $8,085 100.0% (601) 939-4230
2 CENTER FOR VASCULAR MEDICINE LLC GREENBELT MD INTERNAL MEDICINE 9 164 $965,304 $5,886 63.1% (301) 982-2000
3 CENTER FOR ADVANCED CARDIAC AND VASCULAR INTERVENTIONS TARZANA CA CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 11 132 $781,200 $5,918 41.2% (818) 905-5904
4 WEST COAST MEDICINE AND CARDIOLOGY INC FREMONT CA CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 4 94 $376,000 $4,000 29.4% (510) 931-4310
5 FIRST CHOICE PHYSICIAN PARTNERS PALM SPRINGS CA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 148 94 $40,796 $434 29.4% —
That's the top 5 of 21 groups. The platform ranks the whole market — code baskets, benchmarks, and the full ranked list. the full ranking is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →