NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
47531 Injection of bile duct for x-ray through already existing skin access using imaging guidance with review by radiologist CPT · Standard X-ray imaging
Classification Imaging Standard X-ray (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2016
National scale 312 services ▲ 11.0% YoY · 279 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $14K · $45.49 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
10
Named-group FFS services
225
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
+11.0%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~420 services

225 observed fee-for-service (54%) · ~195 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 47531 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$138K
Named-group allowed amount
$13K
Named-group Medicare payments
$10K
Avg charge / svc
$611
Avg allowed / svc
$56
Avg payment / svc
$44
Average charge per group
$214 10 groups · avg submitted charge / service $1,447
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 47531 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 47531 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 ST VINCENT MEDICAL GROUP LITTLE ROCK AR FAMILY PRACTICE 247 72 $56,448 $784 premium 100.0% (501) 562-4838
2 MEDICAL IMAGING OF LEHIGH VALLEY PC ALLENTOWN PA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 119 27 $9,450 $350 premium 40.3% (610) 770-1606
3 MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE JACKSONVILLE FL NURSE PRACTITIONER 1587 23 $33,283 $1,447 premium 100.0% (904) 953-2000
4 ENDEAVOR HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP EVANSTON IL NURSE PRACTITIONER 3380 20 $4,720 $236 premium 62.5%
5 RADIOLOGISTS OF NORTH IOWA PC MASON CITY IA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 14 16 $4,128 $258 premium 26.2% (641) 424-0102
6 LAHEY CLINIC INC BURLINGTON MA NURSE PRACTITIONER 1400 15 $7,282 $485 premium 55.6%
7 RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS OF IOWA PLC CEDAR RAPIDS IA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 72 14 $11,564 $826 premium 23.0% (319) 364-0121
8 NORTH SHORE-LIJ MEDICAL PC MANHASSET NY PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 6294 13 $5,031 $387 premium 100.0%
9 MEDSTAR MEDICAL GROUP II LLC WASHINGTON PA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3707 13 $2,779 $214 premium 19.4% (202) 429-2401
10 SOUTH SHORE RADIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC SOUTH WEYMOUTH MA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 36 12 $2,892 $241 premium 44.4% (781) 340-8000

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →