The full market analysis for this code & state — the shapes are yours; the numbers unlock with Platform.
In Illinois, 1 group bills 51999 — 41 fee-for-service services, and volume is up 32.5% year over year.
The orienting line is free; the comparative synthesis — growth rank, concentration, and $/service against the national figure — unlocks with Platform.
1
41
57%
57%
+32.5%
~72 services
41 observed fee-for-service (57%) · ~31 estimated Medicare Advantage.
The full twelve-year services and payments series, per-year values.
Concentration is not shown for markets under 11 billing groups.
Where this market sits on volume and growth among all state markets, and its rank.
Where each group's volume sits nationally and within its specialty.
Every state market for this search, ranked by a published score: size, growth, fragmentation, below-expected volume. The cross-market compare view sits alongside.
Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.
View the live example →| # | Physician group activate to sort | City activate to sort | Specialty activate to sort | Providers activate to sort | 51999 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse | Submitted charges activate to sort | Avg charge activate to sort | Medicare $ locked column | Share* activate to sort | Phone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NORTHWESTERN MEDICAL FACULTY FOUNDATION | CHICAGO | NURSE PRACTITIONER | 4339 | 41 | $305,791 | $7,458 | premium | 77.4% | — |
*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.
Comparing against an all-payer estimate?
These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →