NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
63005 Partial removal of spine bone with exploration and/or release of lower spinal cord or nerves, 1-2 segments CPT · Musculoskeletal procedure
Classification Procedure Musculoskeletal Laminotomy or Laminectomy - Lumbar (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 326 services ▼ 1.2% YoY · 323 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $219K · $672.31 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
9
Named-group FFS services
158
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-1.2%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~335 services

158 observed fee-for-service (47%) · ~177 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 63005 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$724K
Named-group allowed amount
$113K
Named-group Medicare payments
$90K
Avg charge / svc
$4,585
Avg allowed / svc
$712
Avg payment / svc
$567
Average charge per group
$911 9 groups · avg submitted charge / service $9,844
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 63005 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 63005 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER MN NURSE PRACTITIONER 4896 33 $324,849 $9,844 premium 100.0% (507) 284-2511
2 TUCSON PHYSICIAN GROUP HOLDINGS LLC TUCSON AZ INTERNAL MEDICINE 200 31 $60,872 $1,964 premium 100.0% (520) 396-1360
3 VIRGINIA SPINE INSTITUTE PLC RESTON VA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 15 17 $15,486 $911 premium 100.0% (703) 709-1114
4 ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM GEORGIA INC CALHOUN GA NURSE PRACTITIONER 229 15 $57,945 $3,863 premium 51.7%
5 HILLCREST PHYSICIAN SERVICES WACO TX NURSE PRACTITIONER 113 15 $37,875 $2,525 premium 48.4% (254) 202-7950
6 IHC HEALTH SERVICES INC MURRAY UT PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3944 13 $39,767 $3,059 premium 100.0% (801) 261-8346
7 MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE JACKSONVILLE FL NURSE PRACTITIONER 1587 12 $97,346 $8,112 premium 40.0% (904) 953-2000
8 KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER RICHLAND WA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 382 11 $28,226 $2,566 premium 28.2% (509) 946-4611
9 USC CARE MEDICAL GROUP INC LOS ANGELES CA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 1374 11 $62,040 $5,640 premium 100.0% (800) 872-2273

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →