NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
64495 Injection of lower or sacral spine facet joint using imaging guidance, third and any additional level CPT · Musculoskeletal procedure
Classification Procedure Musculoskeletal Nerve Block Injection - Back (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 469 services ▼ 17.6% YoY · 362 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $45K · $95.34 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
9
Named-group FFS services
365
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-17.6%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~701 services

365 observed fee-for-service (52%) · ~336 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 64495 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$96K
Named-group allowed amount
$43K
Named-group Medicare payments
$35K
Avg charge / svc
$262
Avg allowed / svc
$119
Avg payment / svc
$95
Average charge per group
$143 9 groups · avg submitted charge / service $527
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 64495 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 64495 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 MIDDLETOWN MEDICAL PC MIDDLETOWN NY NURSE PRACTITIONER 172 115 $21,086 $183 premium 74.7% (845) 342-4774
2 TOP PAIN CENTER NORTH AURORA IL NURSE PRACTITIONER 2 98 $14,014 $143 premium 100.0% (630) 809-9707
3 THE PAIN CENTER OF ARIZONA, PC GILBERT AZ PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 18 44 $23,204 $527 premium 60.3% (623) 516-8252
4 UMASS MEMORIAL MEDICAL GROUP INC WORCESTER MA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 2483 25 $12,886 $515 premium 31.2% (508) 334-1000
5 BRUCE E MULLEN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION CARSON CITY NV PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION 4 21 $3,885 $185 premium 100.0% (775) 883-7938
6 PAIN MANAGMENT OF BORO PARK PC BROOKLYN NY INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT 2 19 $6,654 $350 premium 12.3% (718) 435-6441
7 RELIANT MEDICAL GROUP INC WORCESTER MA NURSE PRACTITIONER 634 15 $6,525 $435 premium 18.8% (508) 363-5000
8 BOSTON UNIVERSITY NEUROLOGY ASSOCIATES INC BOSTON MA NEUROLOGY 61 14 $2,911 $208 premium 17.5% (617) 638-8456
9 NURA PLLC EDINA MN PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 36 14 $4,531 $324 premium 100.0% (763) 537-6000

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →