NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
64585 Revision of peripheral neurostimulator electrodes CPT · Musculoskeletal procedure
Classification Procedure Musculoskeletal (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 389 services ▲ 57.5% YoY · 381 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $133K · $341.10 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
11
Named-group FFS services
152
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
+57.5%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~285 services

152 observed fee-for-service (53%) · ~133 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 64585 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$124K
Named-group allowed amount
$19K
Named-group Medicare payments
$15K
Avg charge / svc
$814
Avg allowed / svc
$128
Avg payment / svc
$101
Average charge per group
$290 11 groups · avg submitted charge / service $2,500
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 64585 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 64585 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 SOUTHERN UROGYNECOLOGY LLC WEST COLUMBIA SC CERTIFIED NURSE MIDWIFE (CNM) 5 27 $18,507 $685 premium 42.9% (803) 457-7000
2 BBI DFW PROFEE PLLC MCKINNEY AR UROLOGY 3 16 $40,000 $2,500 premium 28.1% (855) 224-4351
3 REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CA SACRAMENTO CA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 1608 14 $14,392 $1,028 premium 100.0% (877) 827-7463
4 SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP INC EDGEWOOD KY NURSE PRACTITIONER 806 14 $7,966 $569 premium 100.0% (859) 578-5880
5 UROLOGY OF VIRGINIA, PLLC VIRGINIA BEACH VA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 75 13 $5,135 $395 premium 52.0% (757) 452-3599
6 UNIVERSITY UROLOGY PC KNOXVILLE TN UROLOGY 15 12 $7,043 $587 premium 100.0% (865) 305-9254
7 AMERICAN ONCOLOGY PARTNERS PA FORT WAYNE AR HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY 333 12 $7,896 $658 premium 21.1% (260) 484-8830
8 EAST VALLEY UROLOGY CENTER PLC MESA AZ UROLOGY 9 11 $4,914 $447 premium 18.6% (480) 219-1010
9 FIRST UROLOGY PSC LOUISVILLE IN UROLOGY 55 11 $3,190 $290 premium 100.0% (812) 282-3899
10 OXFORD UROLOGY ASSOCIATES PLLC OXFORD MS UROLOGY 17 11 $7,654 $696 premium 19.3%
11 GREATER BOSTON UROLOGY LLC FRAMINGHAM MA UROLOGY 42 11 $7,062 $642 premium 100.0%

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →