NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
64620 Injection of agent to destroy rib nerve CPT · Musculoskeletal procedure
Classification Procedure Musculoskeletal (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 394 services ▲ 62.8% YoY · 146 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $31K · $77.70 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
6
Named-group FFS services
394
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
+62.8%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~720 services

394 observed fee-for-service (55%) · ~326 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 64620 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$303K
Named-group allowed amount
$38K
Named-group Medicare payments
$31K
Avg charge / svc
$769
Avg allowed / svc
$98
Avg payment / svc
$78
Average charge per group
$538 6 groups · avg submitted charge / service $1,545
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 64620 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 64620 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 BERKSHIRE FACULTY SERVICES INC PITTSFIELD MA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 276 142 $82,644 $582 premium 100.0% (413) 447-2695
2 BERKSHIRE FACULTY SERVICES INC PITTSFIELD UT PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 276 72 $41,904 $582 premium 100.0% (413) 447-2695
3 CENTRAL TEXAS SURGICAL ASSOCIATES ROUND ROCK TX GENERAL SURGERY 9 49 $29,400 $600 premium 100.0% (512) 244-0111
4 KANSAS SPINE AND SPECIALTY HOSPITAL LLC WICHITA KS NURSE PRACTITIONER 8 40 $26,331 $658 premium 100.0% (316) 462-5321
5 ADVANCED SPINE AND PAIN LLC PHOENIX AZ PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 27 40 $56,014 $1,400 premium 100.0% (480) 573-0130
6 EASTERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER BANGOR IL PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 697 23 $35,535 $1,545 premium 100.0% (207) 973-7000
7 EASTERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER BANGOR ME PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 697 16 $24,720 $1,545 premium 100.0% (207) 973-7000
8 FLORIDA HOSPITAL MEDICAL GROUP INC MAITLAND FL PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1634 12 $6,456 $538 premium 100.0% (407) 200-2700

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →