NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
64719 Release and/or relocation of wrist nerve CPT · Musculoskeletal procedure
Classification Procedure Musculoskeletal (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 428 services ▼ 4.3% YoY · 403 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $100K · $233.63 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
9
Named-group FFS services
236
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-4.3%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~481 services

236 observed fee-for-service (49%) · ~245 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 64719 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$479K
Named-group allowed amount
$51K
Named-group Medicare payments
$40K
Avg charge / svc
$2,028
Avg allowed / svc
$214
Avg payment / svc
$171
Average charge per group
$1,273 9 groups · avg submitted charge / service $3,122
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 64719 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 64719 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 HOT SPRINGS MEDICAL SURGICAL GROUP SANTA BARBARA CA HAND SURGERY 4 48 $77,710 $1,619 premium 50.5% (805) 682-8907
2 THE ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE, PA GAINESVILLE FL PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 115 45 $77,612 $1,725 premium 66.2% (352) 336-6000
3 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA MONICA CA ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY 67 33 $88,605 $2,685 premium 34.7% (310) 319-1234
4 ENDEAVOR HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP EVANSTON IL NURSE PRACTITIONER 3380 26 $81,172 $3,122 premium 68.4%
5 PIEDMONT ORTHOPEDICS, LLC MARIETTA GA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 195 22 $33,522 $1,524 premium 22.2% (770) 635-1812
6 SPORTS MEDICINE NORTH ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, INC. PEABODY MA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 87 18 $39,240 $2,180 premium 47.4% (978) 818-6350
7 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SAINT LOUIS MO NURSE PRACTITIONER 3070 15 $24,000 $1,600 premium 100.0% (314) 747-3000
8 CHATTANOOGA DIAGNOSTIC ASSOCIATES LLC CHATTANOOGA TN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY 25 15 $19,092 $1,273 premium 100.0% (423) 493-5220
9 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES CA ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY 136 14 $37,590 $2,685 premium 14.7% (310) 443-8999

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →