NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
65920 Removal of implanted lens of eye CPT · Eye procedure
Classification Procedure Eye (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 498 services · est. ▼ 8.9% YoY · 240 FFS beneficiaries (CY2024, all-Medicare estimate) — 244 observed fee-for-service services
Medicare paid $237K · est. · $472.59 avg / service, national — $115K observed FFS
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups

3

Named groups billing this code
Named-group all-Medicare svcs · est.

75

Scaled from 42 observed FFS services.
FFS of Medicare

49%

Payer-mix frame
Services · year over year
Services YoY

-9.0%

All-Medicare est. · observed FFS -11.6%
Volume, not care. A shrinking fee-for-service denominator is not a shrinking market.
Estimated all-Medicare volume estimate
FFS + estimated MA

~75 services

42 observed fee-for-service (56%) · ~33 estimated Medicare Advantage.

Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale
Top states — 65920 (CY2024)

Est. all-Medicare services by billing state (scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS); open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Billed → allowed → paid
Named-group submitted charges
$98K
Named-group allowed amount
$17K
Named-group Medicare payments
$25K · est.
— $14K observed FFS
Avg charge / svc
$2,333
Avg allowed / svc
$414
Avg payment / svc
$332
Totals are named-group (attributable) sums. Allowed is Medicare’s fee-schedule recognized price — what CMS recognizes, before the 80% Medicare pays.
Average charge per group
$840 3 groups · avg submitted charge / service $3,209
Market analyticsPlatform Methods →

Search a single state to see that market's full analytics — each panel renders gated on the free tier.

See it in full: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — every paid panel, on real data.

View the live example →
See the Platform — the full read, every number below, code baskets, and export. Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ locked column25+ locked column100+ locked column independent only locked column
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 65920 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group locked column City locked column St locked column Specialty locked column Providers locked column 65920 svcs Submitted charges locked column Avg charge locked column Medicare $ locked column Share of state* locked column Phone
1 STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA IOWA CITY IA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1902 15 $48,129 $3,209 premium 100.0% (319) 678-8201
2 MEHRAN TABAN MD INC TORRANCE CA OPHTHALMOLOGY 2 15 $39,765 $2,651 premium 17.0% (424) 247-9090
3 WHEATON EYE CLINIC LTD WHEATON IL OPHTHALMOLOGY 45 12 $10,086 $840 premium 52.2% (630) 668-8250

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix — and the observed foundation every market figure here builds on. Market totals anchor on a labeled all-Medicare estimate scaled from that foundation, with the observed count disclosed beside it — Medicare only, never all-payer. Modeled all-payer databases project every payer statistically and typically run higher. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →