NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
67218 Destruction of growth of retina by implantation of radiation source CPT · Eye procedure
Classification Procedure Eye (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 212 services ▼ 35.4% YoY · 207 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $234K · $1105.30 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
9
Named-group FFS services
173
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-35.4%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~380 services

173 observed fee-for-service (46%) · ~207 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 67218 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$1.6M
Named-group allowed amount
$239K
Named-group Medicare payments
$191K
Avg charge / svc
$8,989
Avg allowed / svc
$1,383
Avg payment / svc
$1,104
Average charge per group
$1,632 9 groups · avg submitted charge / service $18,975
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 67218 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 67218 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 SHIELDS AND SHIELDS PC PHILADELPHIA PA OPHTHALMOLOGY 2 36 $683,100 $18,975 premium 100.0% (215) 928-3105
2 TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NEW YORK NY NURSE PRACTITIONER 2273 26 $280,800 $10,800 premium 68.4% (212) 305-8559
3 DUKE HEALTH INTEGRATED PRACTICE INC DURHAM NC PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3051 20 $67,100 $3,355 premium 100.0% (919) 684-8111
4 TENNESSEE RETINA PC NASHVILLE TN OPHTHALMOLOGY 16 20 $91,100 $4,555 premium 100.0% (615) 983-6000
5 JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE MEDICAL GROUP ARCADIA CA OPHTHALMOLOGY 116 17 $156,910 $9,230 premium 100.0% (323) 442-7122
6 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR MI INTERNAL MEDICINE 3330 15 $75,420 $5,028 premium 100.0% (734) 763-5459
7 MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER MN NURSE PRACTITIONER 4896 14 $119,826 $8,559 premium 100.0% (507) 284-2511
8 OSU EYE PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, LLC COLUMBUS OH OPHTHALMOLOGY 49 13 $61,230 $4,710 premium 100.0% (614) 293-8116
9 ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND NEW ORLEANS NY INTERNAL MEDICINE 412 12 $19,581 $1,632 premium 31.6%

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →