NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
73722 Mri scan of leg joint with contrast CPT · Magnetic Resonance imaging
Classification Imaging Magnetic Resonance MRI/MRA - Lower Extremity (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 695 services ▲ 0.0% YoY · 671 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $125K · $180.44 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
8
Named-group FFS services
185
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
+0.0%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~377 services

185 observed fee-for-service (49%) · ~192 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 73722 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$188K
Named-group allowed amount
$47K
Named-group Medicare payments
$37K
Avg charge / svc
$1,014
Avg allowed / svc
$255
Avg payment / svc
$202
Average charge per group
$162 8 groups · avg submitted charge / service $1,989
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 73722 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 73722 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 SDMI, LLC LAS VEGAS NV DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 36 45 $54,225 $1,205 premium 100.0% (702) 732-6000
2 BRIGHT LIGHT MEDICAL IMAGING SC ELK GROVE VILLAGE MO DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 9 34 $48,212 $1,418 premium 69.4% (847) 439-2315
3 MCBRIDE CLINIC ORTHOPEDIC HOSPITAL, LLC OKLAHOMA CITY OK PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 103 34 $5,508 $162 premium 35.4% (405) 604-6000
4 SPORTSMED ORTHOPAEDIC SPECIALISTS HUNTSVILLE AL PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 86 19 $18,905 $995 premium 100.0%
5 DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING CENTERS PA KANSAS CITY MO DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 28 15 $14,322 $955 premium 30.6% (816) 444-9989
6 MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM GIG HARBOR WA NURSE PRACTITIONER 2289 14 $12,348 $882 premium 15.4%
7 GOLDEN STATE ORTHOPEDICS AND SPINE WALNUT CREEK CA ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY 190 13 $25,857 $1,989 premium 8.2% (925) 939-8585
8 GMG HEALTH SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES PA SAN ANTONIO TX NURSE PRACTITIONER 118 11 $8,250 $750 premium 26.2% (210) 509-2603

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →