NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
74485 Review by radiologist of ureter or urethra image CPT · Standard X-ray imaging
Classification Imaging Standard X-ray (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 625 services ▼ 16.6% YoY · 522 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $23K · $36.33 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
10
Named-group FFS services
440
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-16.6%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~855 services

440 observed fee-for-service (51%) · ~415 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 74485 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$456K
Named-group allowed amount
$21K
Named-group Medicare payments
$17K
Avg charge / svc
$1,036
Avg allowed / svc
$49
Avg payment / svc
$39
Average charge per group
$76 10 groups · avg submitted charge / service $3,703
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 74485 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 74485 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI NEW YORK NY PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 2818 108 $399,951 $3,703 premium 77.7% (212) 241-4812
2 SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION PALO ALTO CA INTERNAL MEDICINE 3716 72 $11,736 $163 premium 51.4% (415) 600-1020
3 MONTAGE MEDICAL GROUP MONTEREY CA FAMILY PRACTICE 125 68 $7,956 $117 premium 48.6% (831) 718-9701
4 CAPE FEAR VALLEY HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP LLC FAYETTEVILLE VA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 280 40 $3,040 $76 premium 100.0% (910) 829-6588
5 UROLOGY GROUP OF WESTERN NEW ENGLAND, P.C. SPRINGFIELD MA UROLOGY 11 39 $3,630 $93 premium 60.9% (413) 785-5321
6 UROLOGY GROUP OF WESTERN NEW ENGLAND, P.C. SPRINGFIELD NY UROLOGY 11 31 $2,970 $96 premium 22.3% (413) 785-5321
7 ADVANCED UROLOGY ASSOCIATES ENTERPRISES SHREWSBURY NJ UROLOGY 18 23 $15,617 $679 premium 100.0% (732) 741-5923
8 COMPREHENSIVE UROLOGIC CARE S C LAKE BARRINGTON IL PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 14 18 $3,600 $200 premium 100.0% (847) 382-5080
9 ARIZONA DIGESTIVE HEALTH PC GLENDALE AZ GASTROENTEROLOGY 132 16 $2,944 $184 premium 100.0% (602) 843-1265
10 SSM MEDICAL GROUP INC SAINT LOUIS MO NURSE PRACTITIONER 547 14 $1,148 $82 premium 100.0% (314) 645-6450
11 UROLOGY PARTNERS OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC ARLINGTON TX UROLOGY 89 11 $3,229 $294 premium 9.7%

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →