NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
76120 Imaging of organ CPT · Standard X-ray imaging
Classification Imaging Standard X-ray (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 3,374 services ▲ 0.8% YoY · 2,445 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $155K · $46.06 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
8
Named-group FFS services
2,741
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
+0.8%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~4,816 services

2,741 observed fee-for-service (57%) · ~2,075 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 76120 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$559K
Named-group allowed amount
$132K
Named-group Medicare payments
$104K
Avg charge / svc
$204
Avg allowed / svc
$48
Avg payment / svc
$38
Average charge per group
$100 8 groups · avg submitted charge / service $555
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 76120 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 76120 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 MBS IMAGING LLC LOMBARD IL INTERNAL MEDICINE 4 2,258 $451,600 $200 premium 91.3% (877) 495-7152
2 PERSPECTIVE BEHAVIORAL AND PAIN SOLUTIONS INC DES PLAINES IL PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 6 215 $53,750 $250 premium 8.7% (847) 306-7277
3 DYNAMIC MEDICAL SOLUTIONS EDMOND OK DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 4 84 $13,440 $160 premium 28.2% (405) 216-5875
4 ORTHO CENTRAL NORMAN OK PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 32 77 $15,800 $205 premium 25.8%
5 TETON FOOT AND ANKLE CENTER, PC IDAHO FALLS ID PODIATRY 2 35 $8,750 $250 premium 100.0% (208) 528-6225
6 UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION, PC BIRMINGHAM AL NURSE PRACTITIONER 2788 29 $2,900 $100 premium 100.0% (205) 934-3460
7 UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION, PC BIRMINGHAM AR NURSE PRACTITIONER 2788 18 $1,800 $100 premium 100.0% (205) 934-3460
8 TEXOMA UROLOGY CENTER WICHITA FALLS TX UROLOGY 5 13 $3,900 $300 premium 27.1% (940) 689-8765
9 MCLAREN CENTRAL MICHIGAN PETOSKEY SC NURSE PRACTITIONER 171 12 $6,660 $555 premium 7.6% (231) 487-7200

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →