NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
76497 Other ct scan CPT · CT Scan imaging
Classification Imaging CT Scan (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2015
National scale 856 services ▼ 16.1% YoY · 848 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $130K · $151.76 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
8
Named-group FFS services
733
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-16.1%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~1,582 services

733 observed fee-for-service (46%) · ~849 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 76497 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$1.6M
Named-group allowed amount
$143K
Named-group Medicare payments
$113K
Avg charge / svc
$2,149
Avg allowed / svc
$194
Avg payment / svc
$154
Average charge per group
$150 8 groups · avg submitted charge / service $3,000
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 76497 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 76497 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER MN NURSE PRACTITIONER 4896 412 $1,236,000 $3,000 premium 96.9% (507) 284-2511
2 MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL PHYSICIANS ORGANIZATION INC BOSTON MA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 3532 114 $96,330 $845 premium 100.0% (617) 724-0287
3 ONCOLOGY-HEMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS P C PEORIA IL NURSE PRACTITIONER 62 85 $180,372 $2,122 premium 100.0% (309) 243-3000
4 UNMC PHYSICIANS OMAHA NE PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1514 43 $10,750 $250 premium 100.0% (402) 559-4000
5 TOLEDO RADIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC COLDWATER OH DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 51 23 $3,450 $150 premium 41.8% (517) 279-5400
6 UNIVERSITY OF PENN - MEDICAL GROUP PHILADELPHIA PA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3505 16 $11,200 $700 premium 39.0% (215) 662-2777
7 H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR AND RES INST LIFE TIME CANCER SCRN CTR INC TAMPA FL PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1103 14 $20,983 $1,499 premium 51.9% (813) 745-4673
8 MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL PHYSICIANS ORGANIZATION INC BOSTON MO DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 3532 13 $8,775 $675 premium 54.2% (617) 724-0287
9 MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM-SOUTHWEST WISCONSIN REGION INC LA CROSSE MN FAMILY PRACTICE 547 13 $7,176 $552 premium 3.1% (608) 785-0940

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →