NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
77084 Mri scan of bone marrow CPT · Magnetic Resonance imaging
Classification Imaging Magnetic Resonance MRI/MRA - Other (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 1,117 services ▼ 3.1% YoY · 1,040 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $76K · $68.09 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups

5

Named groups billing this code
Named-group FFS services

844

Attributable volume · fee-for-service
FFS of Medicare

49%

Payer-mix frame
Services · year over year
Services YoY

-3.1%

FFS enrollment -2.2%
Volume, not care. A shrinking fee-for-service denominator is not a shrinking market.
Estimated all-Medicare volume estimate
FFS + estimated MA

~1,617 services

844 observed fee-for-service (52%) · ~773 estimated Medicare Advantage.

Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale
Top states — 77084 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Billed → allowed → paid
Named-group submitted charges
$375K
Named-group allowed amount
$63K
Named-group Medicare payments
$49K
Avg charge / svc
$445
Avg allowed / svc
$75
Avg payment / svc
$58
Totals are named-group (attributable) sums. Allowed is Medicare’s fee-schedule recognized price — what CMS recognizes, before the 80% Medicare pays.
Average charge per group
$199 5 groups · avg submitted charge / service $1,986
Market analyticsPlatform Methods →

Search a single state to see that market's full analytics — the free tier previews every panel, gated.

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →
Unlock the Platform — the full read, every number below, code baskets, and export. Looking is free; the depth is paid. Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 77084 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 77084 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES LITTLE ROCK AR NURSE PRACTITIONER 1241 573 $139,812 $244 premium 100.0% (501) 686-8000
2 PHYSICIANS REFERRAL SERVICE HOUSTON TX NURSE PRACTITIONER 2696 213 $162,594 $763 premium 73.2% (713) 592-5433
3 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK NY DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 5704 34 $67,524 $1,986 premium 38.6% (212) 263-9700
4 RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS PC OMAHA NE DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 46 12 $3,120 $260 premium 100.0% (402) 717-4760
5 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ADULT SERVICES SALT LAKE CITY WI PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1783 12 $2,382 $199 premium 100.0% (801) 581-2121

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →