NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
78018 Nuclear medicine study of whole body for thyroid cancer CPT · Nuclear imaging
Classification Imaging Nuclear (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 350 services ▼ 5.4% YoY · 300 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $10K · $29.22 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
10
Named-group FFS services
186
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-5.4%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~357 services

186 observed fee-for-service (52%) · ~171 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation; 1 state without payer-mix data excluded. How we scale

Top states — 78018 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$43K
Named-group allowed amount
$7K
Named-group Medicare payments
$6K
Avg charge / svc
$231
Avg allowed / svc
$39
Avg payment / svc
$30
Average charge per group
$129 10 groups · avg submitted charge / service $676
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 78018 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 78018 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 MEDSTAR MEDICAL GROUP II LLC WASHINGTON DC PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3707 40 $5,160 $129 premium 100.0% (202) 429-2401
2 NORTH SHORE-LIJ MEDICAL PC MANHASSET CT PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 6294 27 $5,766 $214 premium 100.0%
3 RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF NORTH TEXAS PA FORT WORTH TX DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 340 17 $2,771 $163 premium 100.0% (817) 321-0470
4 NORTHWESTERN MEDICAL FACULTY FOUNDATION CHICAGO XX NURSE PRACTITIONER 4339 17 $2,890 $170 premium 100.0%
5 QUANTUM RADIOLOGY PC MARIETTA GA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 104 17 $3,519 $207 premium 100.0% (770) 732-4000
6 BEAUMONT MEDICAL GROUP- SPECIALTY SERVICES ROYAL OAK MI PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 833 16 $10,824 $676 premium 50.0% (248) 898-5058
7 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR MI INTERNAL MEDICINE 3330 16 $4,992 $312 premium 50.0% (734) 763-5459
8 KETTERING NETWORK RADIOLOGISTS INC DAYTON OH DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 74 13 $2,015 $155 premium 100.0% (937) 558-3800
9 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK NY DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 5704 12 $3,528 $294 premium 100.0% (212) 263-9700
10 KENTUCKY MEDICAL SERVICES FOUNDATION, INC LEXINGTON KY DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 989 11 $1,584 $144 premium 47.8% (859) 257-1412

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →