NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
80197 Tacrolimus level CPT · General Laboratory test
Classification Test General Laboratory Clinical Chemistry (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 343,872 services ▼ 1.1% YoY · 73,338 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $4.6M · $13.41 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
12
Named-group FFS services
11,863
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-1.1%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~24,756 services

11,863 observed fee-for-service (48%) · ~12,893 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 80197 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$1.9M
Named-group allowed amount
$159K
Named-group Medicare payments
$159K
Avg charge / svc
$159
Avg allowed / svc
$13
Avg payment / svc
$13
Average charge per group
$41 12 groups · avg submitted charge / service $532
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 80197 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 80197 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA PHOENIX AZ PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1635 8,951 $1,655,935 $185 premium 39.0% (800) 603-0558
2 FAIRVIEW CLINICS EAGAN MN FAMILY PRACTICE 816 882 $36,351 $41 premium 8.3% (651) 406-8860
3 TEXAS ONCOLOGY PA DALLAS TX PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 995 478 $48,278 $101 premium 1.8%
4 FAIRVIEW EXPRESS CARE MINNEAPOLIS MN PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 2007 314 $12,967 $41 premium 2.9% (612) 672-7422
5 HEALTHEAST MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE SAINT PAUL MN PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 691 303 $12,528 $41 premium 2.8%
6 CLEVELAND CLINIC CLEVELAND OH PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 6828 266 $28,836 $108 premium 3.1%
7 ST CHARLES HEALTH SYSTEM INC BEND OR PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 373 171 $17,271 $101 premium 7.7% (541) 706-7715
8 EASTERN NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES PLLC GREENVILLE NC NEPHROLOGY 77 132 $5,437 $41 premium 0.4% (252) 752-8880
9 SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION PALO ALTO CA INTERNAL MEDICINE 3716 130 $13,260 $102 premium 0.2% (415) 600-1020
10 METROLINA NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES PA CHARLOTTE NC NEPHROLOGY 87 119 $9,520 $80 premium 0.3% (704) 731-6451
11 WEST CENTRAL PATHOLOGY SPECIALISTS SC QUINCY IL PATHOLOGY 4 88 $46,856 $532 premium 1.0% 21722384006209
12 WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES WINSTON SALEM NC PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 2609 29 $2,320 $80 premium 0.1% (336) 713-9800

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →