NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
82374 Carbon dioxide (bicarbonate) level CPT · General Laboratory test
Classification Test General Laboratory Clinical Chemistry (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 59,610 services ▼ 6.1% YoY · 52,424 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $279K · $4.67 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
9
Named-group FFS services
2,366
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-6.1%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~4,751 services

2,366 observed fee-for-service (50%) · ~2,385 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 82374 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$42K
Named-group allowed amount
$11K
Named-group Medicare payments
$11K
Avg charge / svc
$18
Avg allowed / svc
$5
Avg payment / svc
$5
Average charge per group
$12 9 groups · avg submitted charge / service $30
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 82374 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 82374 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 KANDASWAMY JAYARAJ MD PA BEAUMONT TX NURSE PRACTITIONER 3 753 $13,554 $18 premium 10.5% (409) 833-6900
2 ABRAHAM ISHAAYA M D A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LOS ANGELES CA INTERNAL MEDICINE 2 681 $13,620 $20 premium 6.5%
3 ACCESS PAIN SOLUTIONS TULSA OK NURSE PRACTITIONER 13 507 $6,084 $12 premium 44.3% (918) 710-4112
4 MIDDLE GEORGIA CHEST AND MEDICAL CENTER, LLC MILLEDGEVILLE GA INTERNAL MEDICINE 4 162 $2,430 $15 premium 19.0% (478) 452-3200
5 AV CRITICAL CARE INC LANCASTER CA INTERNAL MEDICINE 12 99 $1,980 $20 premium 0.9% (661) 948-8000
6 MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA PHOENIX AZ PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1635 81 $2,430 $30 premium 2.6% (800) 603-0558
7 MICHIGAN INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY PC SAINT CLAIR SHORES MI UROLOGY 84 48 $720 $15 premium 15.2% (586) 771-4820
8 ARTHRITIS CENTER OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN NE PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 8 18 $360 $20 premium 42.9% (402) 420-1212
9 PRACTICE ASSOCIATES MEDICAL GROUP MORRISTOWN NJ NURSE PRACTITIONER 1404 17 $374 $22 premium 0.2% (973) 971-5596

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →