NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
83050 Methemoglobin (hemoglobin) analysis, quantitative CPT · General Laboratory test
Classification Test General Laboratory Blood Count (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 1,865 services ▼ 24.1% YoY · 1,634 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $15K · $8.00 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
9
Named-group FFS services
984
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-24.1%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~2,088 services

984 observed fee-for-service (47%) · ~1,104 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 83050 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$65K
Named-group allowed amount
$8K
Named-group Medicare payments
$8K
Avg charge / svc
$66
Avg allowed / svc
$8
Avg payment / svc
$8
Average charge per group
$9 9 groups · avg submitted charge / service $110
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 83050 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 83050 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 ALLISON CURTIS KINGSLEY MEOZ MICHAEL AND SANCHEZ PC LAS VEGAS NV NURSE PRACTITIONER 71 202 $18,786 $93 premium 60.8% (702) 952-2140
2 MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA PHOENIX AZ PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1635 166 $9,960 $60 premium 100.0% (800) 603-0558
3 OCALA LUNG AND CRITICAL CARE ASSOCATES INC OCALA FL NURSE PRACTITIONER 19 142 $1,278 $9 premium 58.2% (352) 732-5552
4 PINEHURST MEDICAL CLINIC INC PINEHURST NC PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 156 123 $7,749 $63 premium 54.2% (910) 295-5511
5 MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER MN NURSE PRACTITIONER 4896 113 $8,136 $72 premium 55.7% (507) 284-2511
6 MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE JACKSONVILLE FL NURSE PRACTITIONER 1587 90 $9,900 $110 premium 36.9% (904) 953-2000
7 BOZEMAN HEALTH DEACONESS HOSPITAL BOZEMAN MT PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 305 79 $6,320 $80 premium 100.0% (406) 414-4800
8 SAINT LUKES PHYSICIAN GROUP INC KANSAS CITY MO NURSE PRACTITIONER 1228 51 $1,275 $25 premium 100.0%
9 TEAMWORK HEALTH PLLC FAYETTEVILLE NC NURSE PRACTITIONER 7 18 $1,134 $63 premium 7.9% (910) 491-6793

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →