NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
93786 Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, 1 day or longer, with recording CPT · Cardiography test
Classification Test Cardiography External Electrocardiographic Monitoring (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 235 services ▲ 197.5% YoY · 231 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $4K · $18.93 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
5
Named-group FFS services
207
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
+197.5%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~349 services

207 observed fee-for-service (59%) · ~142 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 93786 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$22K
Named-group allowed amount
$5K
Named-group Medicare payments
$4K
Avg charge / svc
$107
Avg allowed / svc
$25
Avg payment / svc
$19
Average charge per group
$98 5 groups · avg submitted charge / service $122
Disease-burden context

High blood pressure prevalence: 25.6–42.0% of adults across 54 reporting states (CDC BRFSS 2021–2023, age-adjusted state estimates). Highest: MS 42.0% · AL 40.4% · LA 39.9% · WV 39.1% · AR 38.7%
CDC-published US estimate: 34.0% (BRFSS 2023, crude prevalence — not age-adjusted, so not directly comparable to the state figures above).

CDC BRFSS prevalence is survey data covering all-payer adults 18 and older; Nevvi utilization counts Medicare fee-for-service only, largely 65 and older. The two appear side by side as context — Nevvi never combines them into a score, rating, or ranking. See Methods.

Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by 93786 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort 93786 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM MEDICAL GROUP SUBURBAN MASSACHUSETTS INC NEWTON MA INTERNAL MEDICINE 535 150 $15,849 $106 premium 100.0% (617) 243-6000
2 UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS DALLAS TX PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3200 17 $1,938 $114 premium 34.7% (214) 633-5555
3 MEMORIAL MRI AND DIAGNOSTIC LLC HOUSTON TX DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 71 15 $1,575 $105 premium 30.6% (713) 461-3399
4 NORTHWESTERN MEDICAL FACULTY FOUNDATION CHICAGO IL NURSE PRACTITIONER 4339 14 $1,708 $122 premium 100.0%
5 WHITE PLAINS MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, PC NYACK NY INTERNAL MEDICINE 94 11 $1,074 $98 premium 100.0% (845) 897-8371

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →