NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

93797 nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS

93797 — Outpatient heart rehabilitation, qualified health care professional services

Billing groups
8
Named-group FFS services
9,191
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-9.1%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~19,833 services

9,191 observed fee-for-service (46%) · ~10,642 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — 93797 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$978K
Named-group allowed amount
$125K
Named-group Medicare payments
$93K
Avg charge / svc
$106
Avg allowed / svc
$14
Avg payment / svc
$10
Average charge per group
$39 8 groups · avg submitted charge / service $488
Disease-burden context

Coronary heart disease prevalence: 1.0–5.8% of adults across 54 reporting states (CDC BRFSS 2023–2024, age-adjusted state estimates). Highest: KY 5.8% · WV 5.8% · AR 5.2% · AL 4.9% · LA 4.9%
CDC-published US estimate: 4.4% (BRFSS 2024, crude prevalence — not age-adjusted, so not directly comparable to the state figures above).

CDC BRFSS prevalence is survey data covering all-payer adults 18 and older; Nevvi utilization counts Medicare fee-for-service only, largely 65 and older. The two appear side by side as context — Nevvi never combines them into a score, rating, or ranking. See Methods.

Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 🔒 CY2021 🔒 CY2020 🔒
Physician groups ranked by 93797 services, CY2024
#Physician group City St Specialty Providers 93797 svcs Submitted charges Avg charge Medicare $ locked column Share* Phone
1 DUKE HEALTH INTEGRATED PRACTICE INC DURHAM NC PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3051 3,657 $296,217 $81 premium 85.1% (919) 684-8111
2 MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA PHOENIX AZ PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1635 2,113 $335,967 $159 premium 87.6% (800) 603-0558
3 NORTH SHORE-LIJ MEDICAL PC MANHASSET NY PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 6294 1,935 $193,500 $100 premium 95.0%
4 FHPG LLC PINEHURST NC PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 198 618 $23,870 $39 premium 14.4% (910) 715-2164
5 MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA PHOENIX MN PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1635 393 $62,487 $159 premium 100.0% (800) 603-0558
6 UC REGENTS ORANGE CA INTERNAL MEDICINE 296 177 $14,514 $82 premium 100.0% (714) 456-7002
7 ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI NEW YORK NY PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 2818 102 $7,140 $70 premium 5.0% (212) 241-4812
8 DUKE HEALTH INTEGRATED PRACTICE INC DURHAM TN PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3051 101 $8,181 $81 premium 100.0% (919) 684-8111
9 GUNDERSEN CLINIC LTD LA CROSSE WI PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 443 71 $34,653 $488 premium 49.3%
10 MULTICARE HEALTH SYSTEM GIG HARBOR CO NURSE PRACTITIONER 2289 24 $1,080 $45 premium 100.0%

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →