NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
95939 Placement of skin electrodes and measurement of central motor stimulation in arms and legs CPT · Neurologic test
Classification Test › Neurologic › Electrical Nerve Conductivity (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 51,987 services ▲ 8.7% YoY · 51,111 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $5.1M · $97.44 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups

96

Named groups billing this code
Named-group FFS services

20,474

Attributable volume · fee-for-service
FFS of Medicare

49%

Payer-mix frame
Services · year over year
Services YoY

+8.7%

FFS enrollment -2.2%
Volume, not care. A shrinking fee-for-service denominator is not a shrinking market.
Estimated all-Medicare volume estimate
FFS + estimated MA

~42,017 services

20,474 observed fee-for-service (49%) · ~21,543 estimated Medicare Advantage.

Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation; 1 state without payer-mix data excluded. How we scale
Top states — 95939 (CY2024)
CA 8,559 TX 7,215 FL 4,632 NY 3,434 CO 2,479

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Billed → allowed → paid
Named-group submitted charges
$59.9M
Named-group allowed amount
$2.4M
Named-group Medicare payments
$1.9M
Avg charge / svc
$2,926
Avg allowed / svc
$117
Avg payment / svc
$93
Totals are named-group (attributable) sums. Allowed is Medicare’s fee-schedule recognized price — what CMS recognizes, before the 80% Medicare pays.
Average charge per group
$209 96 groups · avg submitted charge / service $17,987
Market analyticsPlatform Methods →

Search a single state to see that market's full analytics — the free tier previews every panel, gated.

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →
Unlock the Platform — the full read, every number below, code baskets, and export. Looking is free; the depth is paid. Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022  CY2021  CY2020 
# Physician group City St Specialty Providers 95939 svcs Submitted charges Avg charge Medicare $ Share* Phone
1 PACIFIC NEUROMONITORING ASSOCIATES INC ENCINO CA NEUROLOGY 7 1,205 $4,755,262 $3,946 14.1% (734) 213-9240
2 AMERICAN NEUROMONITORING ASSOCIATES, PC AUSTIN FL NEUROLOGY 29 1,002 $4,108,200 $4,100 21.6% (734) 213-9249
3 MPOWER CLINICAL TX PHOENIX TX PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 32 866 $1,714,511 $1,980 12.0% (210) 598-4268
4 AMERICAN NEUROMONITORING ASSOCIATES, PC AUSTIN OH NEUROLOGY 29 684 $2,804,400 $4,100 29.2% (734) 213-9249
5 ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEURODIAGNOSTICS LLC BELLAIRE CO NEUROLOGY 9 500 $1,894,289 $3,789 20.2% (303) 776-5298
That's the top 5 of 96 groups. The platform ranks the whole market — code baskets, benchmarks, and the full ranked list. the full ranking is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →