NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
A9560 Technetium tc-99m labeled red blood cells, diagnostic, per study dose, up to 30 millicuries HCPCS · Nuclear imaging
Classification Imaging Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Scan (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2013 — start of our 12-year window; the code predates it
National scale 893 services ▼ 8.9% YoY · 819 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $82K · $91.47 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
11
Named-group FFS services
323
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-8.9%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~674 services

323 observed fee-for-service (48%) · ~351 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — A9560 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$92K
Named-group allowed amount
$47K
Named-group Medicare payments
$38K
Avg charge / svc
$285
Avg allowed / svc
$147
Avg payment / svc
$117
Average charge per group
$120 11 groups · avg submitted charge / service $519
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by A9560 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort A9560 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION SACRAMENTO CA DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 2420 52 $15,861 $305 premium 21.8% (916) 681-8852
2 NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES LLP PLAINS PA CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 6 44 $13,200 $300 premium 100.0% (570) 823-1111
3 WATSON CLINIC LLP LAKELAND FL NURSE PRACTITIONER 363 33 $7,095 $215 premium 25.2% (863) 680-7780
4 CENTRAL ARKANSAS RADIATION THERAPY INSTITUTE INC LITTLE ROCK AR HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY 90 32 $16,608 $519 premium 100.0%
5 SACRAMENTO HEART AND VASCULAR MEDICAL SACRAMENTO CA CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 9 30 $6,450 $215 premium 12.6% (916) 830-2000
6 NEVADA HEART AND VASCULAR CENTER RESH LLP LAS VEGAS NV CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 42 30 $9,027 $301 premium 100.0% (702) 240-6482
7 UNIVERSITY CANCER AND BLOOD CENTER LLC ATHENS GA NURSE PRACTITIONER 56 30 $9,888 $330 premium 68.2% (706) 353-2990
8 HEART AND VASCULAR CENTER OF ARIZONA, PLLC PHOENIX AZ INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY 14 24 $2,880 $120 premium 58.5% (602) 307-0070
9 VHS OUTPATIENT CLINICS INC PHOENIX AZ PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 180 17 $4,131 $243 premium 41.5% (602) 274-6506
10 NAPLES INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, LLC NAPLES FL INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY 2 17 $3,502 $206 premium 13.0% (239) 643-9977
11 IMPRESSION IMAGING LLC TAMARAC FL DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 20 14 $3,500 $250 premium 10.7% (954) 580-2780

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →