NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

J3145 nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS

J3145 — Injection, testosterone undecanoate, 1 mg

Billing groups
36
Named-group FFS services
4,629,952
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
+5.6%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~9,352,811 services

4,629,952 observed fee-for-service (50%) · ~4,722,859 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — J3145 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$18.3M
Named-group allowed amount
$8.6M
Named-group Medicare payments
$6.8M
Avg charge / svc
$4
Avg allowed / svc
$2
Avg payment / svc
$1
Average charge per group
$2 36 groups · avg submitted charge / service $10
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →

Specialty market — Urology: 2,233,589 services across 12 groups; top group 19%. See Urology across all states →

Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results: clear filters

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 🔒 CY2021 🔒 CY2020 🔒
Physician groups ranked by J3145 services, CY2024
#Physician group City St Specialty Providers J3145 svcs Submitted charges Avg charge Medicare $ locked column Share of specialty*Share of state* Phone
1 INTEGRATED MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS PLLC SEAFORD NY UROLOGY 98 422,250 $1,466,303 $3 premium 67.3% (516) 520-8080
2 DR THOMAS C SUITS MD PA STUART FL UROLOGY 2 417,006 $1,042,515 $2 premium 69.0% (772) 220-9871
3 VIRGINIA UROLOGY CENTER RICHMOND VA UROLOGY 90 294,757 $884,271 $3 premium 66.5% (804) 330-9105
4 DOUBLE J UROLOGY LLC HAMMOND LA UROLOGY 3 222,751 $508,502 $2 premium 29.4% (985) 542-7766
5 CHESAPEAKE UROLOGY ASSOCIATES LLC BALTIMORE MD UROLOGY 160 158,250 $474,750 $3 premium 100.0% (410) 825-5454
6 ARIZONA UROLOGY SPECIALISTS PLLC MESA AZ UROLOGY 81 153,750 $461,250 $3 premium 100.0% (602) 222-1900
7 CONRAD PEARSON CLINIC PC SOUTHAVEN TN UROLOGY 21 108,250 $866,000 $8 premium 100.0% (662) 349-1964
8 ADVANCED UROLOGY INSTITUTE LLC INVERNESS FL UROLOGY 147 101,450 $328,550 $3 premium 16.8% (352) 726-9707
9 POTOMAC UROLOGY CENTER, LLC WOODBRIDGE VA UROLOGY 17 88,500 $354,000 $4 premium 20.0% (703) 680-2111
10 UROLOGY SPECIALISTS PC HUNTSVILLE AL UROLOGY 7 78,000 $195,000 $2 premium 35.5% (256) 882-3605
11 UROLOGY SPECIALISTS PC HUNTSVILLE MS UROLOGY 7 64,125 $160,312 $2 premium 67.1% (256) 882-3605
12 UROLOGY ASSOCIATES OF MOBILE, P.A. MOBILE AL UROLOGY 60 56,250 $124,312 $2 premium 25.6% (251) 433-1895
13 GREATER BOSTON UROLOGY LLC FRAMINGHAM MA UROLOGY 42 34,500 $115,230 $3 premium 11.6%
14 UROLOGY ASSOCIATES OF MOBILE, P.A. MOBILE LA UROLOGY 60 33,750 $74,062 $2 premium 4.5% (251) 433-1895

*"Share of specialty" is the group's share of disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code among groups with the SAME modal specialty in the state; "share of state" is the same figure against the whole state. Specialty is each group's modal member specialty from CMS's clinician register — a multi-specialty group carries one label. Where fewer than 11 groups share the specialty in the state, the specialty share renders "—" — the specialty benchmark is suppressed (fewer than 11 groups) and the state share alongside is the benchmark. Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →