NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
J9047 Injection, carfilzomib, 1 mg HCPCS · Chemotherapy treatment
Classification Treatment Chemotherapy Chemotherapeutic Agent (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2014
National scale 162,044 services ▼ 17.6% YoY · 426 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $6.2M · $38.09 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
8
Named-group FFS services
86,072
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-17.6%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~167,615 services

86,072 observed fee-for-service (51%) · ~81,543 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — J9047 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$11.1M
Named-group allowed amount
$4.1M
Named-group Medicare payments
$3.3M
Avg charge / svc
$129
Avg allowed / svc
$48
Avg payment / svc
$38
Average charge per group
$90 8 groups · avg submitted charge / service $199
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: practice size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by J9047 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort J9047 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 NORTHWESTERN MEDICAL FACULTY FOUNDATION CHICAGO IL NURSE PRACTITIONER 4339 21,440 $2,529,920 $118 premium 90.3%
2 JACKSON ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES JACKSON MS HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY 11 15,880 $1,588,000 $100 premium 100.0% (601) 974-5600
3 HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF CNY, PC EAST SYRACUSE NY NURSE PRACTITIONER 61 10,380 $934,111 $90 premium 47.0% (315) 472-7504
4 MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA PHOENIX AZ PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1635 10,050 $1,997,300 $199 premium 53.1% (800) 603-0558
5 ALLISON CURTIS KINGSLEY MEOZ MICHAEL AND SANCHEZ PC LAS VEGAS NV NURSE PRACTITIONER 71 9,630 $1,395,780 $145 premium 100.0% (702) 952-2140
6 WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL NEW YORK NY INTERNAL MEDICINE 2053 8,302 $996,240 $120 premium 37.6% (212) 746-5454
7 MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE JACKSONVILLE FL NURSE PRACTITIONER 1587 5,380 $1,029,475 $191 premium 100.0% (904) 953-2000
8 ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE BUFFALO NY NURSE PRACTITIONER 502 3,400 $401,200 $118 premium 15.4% (716) 845-2300
9 NORTHWESTERN MEDICAL FACULTY FOUNDATION CHICAGO MI NURSE PRACTITIONER 4339 1,610 $189,980 $118 premium 100.0%

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →