NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
Q4190 Artacent ac, per square centimeter HCPCS · Medical/Surgical Supplies dme
Classification DME Medical/Surgical Supplies Skin Allograft (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2022
National scale 6,115 services ▼ 72.2% YoY · 228 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $1.6M · $264.96 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups
8
Named-group FFS services
5,313
FFS of Medicare
49%
Services YoY
-72.2%
FFS enrollment -2.2%
Estimated all-Medicare volume FFS + estimated MA estimate
~10,932 services

5,313 observed fee-for-service (49%) · ~5,619 estimated Medicare Advantage. Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale

Top states — Q4190 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Named-group submitted charges
$5.2M
Named-group allowed amount
$1.8M
Named-group Medicare payments
$1.4M
Avg charge / svc
$972
Avg allowed / svc
$333
Avg payment / svc
$266
Average charge per group
$381 8 groups · avg submitted charge / service $1,500
Market analyticsPlatform
a taste of the twelve-year trend layer

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →

Nevvi's market analytics platform — code baskets, market structure and share, the twelve-year trend layer — is built and not launched yet. We're gathering interest in it.

Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ 25+ 100+ independent only
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by Q4190 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group activate to sort City activate to sort St activate to sort Specialty activate to sort Providers activate to sort Q4190 svcs sorted descending — activate to reverse Submitted charges activate to sort Avg charge activate to sort Medicare $ locked column Share* activate to sort Phone
1 SKIN SURGERY CENTER PA WINSTON SALEM NC PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 73 1,450 $1,544,500 $1,065 premium 81.9% (336) 724-2434
2 PINNACLE DERMATOLOGY SC JOLIET AZ PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 144 1,411 $1,488,438 $1,055 premium 100.0% (815) 744-8554
3 CUMBERLAND SKIN SURGERY AND DERMATOLOGY LEBANON TN PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 55 925 $858,236 $928 premium 80.0% (615) 449-5771
4 PINNACLE DERMATOLOGY SC JOLIET TX PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 144 504 $467,581 $928 premium 58.9% (815) 744-8554
5 LONG ISLAND PLASTIC SURGICAL GROUP, PC GARDEN CITY NY PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 41 254 $96,717 $381 premium 100.0% (516) 629-3838
6 HEALTHSTAR PHYSICIANS PC MORRISTOWN TN NURSE PRACTITIONER 90 231 $346,500 $1,500 premium 20.0%
7 ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY AND SKIN CANCER CENTER PA GRAND ISLAND KS PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 4 194 $165,746 $854 premium 29.0% (308) 384-0133
8 KANSAS MEDICAL CLINIC PA TOPEKA KS PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 50 190 $133,000 $700 premium 28.4% (785) 272-6860
9 GREAT PLAINS DERMATOLOGY, P.A. HAYS KS DERMATOLOGY 4 154 $61,100 $397 premium 23.1% (785) 625-7546

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →