NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
Q4239 Amnio-maxx or amnio-maxx lite, per square centimeter HCPCS · Medical/Surgical Supplies dme
Classification DME Medical/Surgical Supplies Skin Allograft (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2024
National scale 47,039 services · 892 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $89.8M · $1908.24 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups

18

Named groups billing this code
Named-group all-Medicare svcs · est.

56,163

Scaled from 26,247 observed FFS services.
FFS of Medicare

49%

Payer-mix frame
Services YoY

Estimated all-Medicare volume estimate
FFS + estimated MA

~56,163 services

26,247 observed fee-for-service (47%) · ~29,916 estimated Medicare Advantage.

Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale
Top states — Q4239 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Billed → allowed → paid
Named-group submitted charges
$73.5M
Named-group allowed amount
$62.9M
Named-group Medicare payments
$50.1M
Avg charge / svc
$2,799
Avg allowed / svc
$2,396
Avg payment / svc
$1,909
Totals are named-group (attributable) sums. Allowed is Medicare’s fee-schedule recognized price — what CMS recognizes, before the 80% Medicare pays.
Average charge per group
$2,400 18 groups · avg submitted charge / service $6,008
Market analyticsPlatform Methods →

Search a single state to see that market's full analytics — the free tier previews every panel, gated.

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →
Unlock the Platform — the full read, every number below, code baskets, and export. Looking is free; the depth is paid. Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ locked column25+ locked column100+ locked column independent only locked column
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by Q4239 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group locked column City locked column St locked column Specialty locked column Providers locked column Q4239 svcs Submitted charges locked column Avg charge locked column Medicare $ locked column Share of state* locked column Phone
1 PRESTIGE FOOT AND ANKLE CENTER LLC MEDINA OH PODIATRY 9 10,738 $26,458,432 $2,464 premium 100.0% (330) 591-9635
2 FRONTIER FOOT AND ANKLE SPECIALISTS LLC BANDON TX PODIATRY 3 3,856 $9,267,145 $2,403 premium 70.0% (541) 329-2555
3 RAKHESH GUTTIKONDA MEDICAL INC NATIONAL CITY CA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 2 1,600 $4,800,000 $3,000 premium 8.5% (619) 470-4325
4 FOOT AND ANKLE SPECIALISTS OF ARIZONA PLLC GLENDALE AZ PODIATRY 14 1,248 $3,011,872 $2,413 premium 54.5% (623) 544-9090
5 MUNDH NP AND GARRETSON MD MEDICAL CORPORATION Live Oak CA NURSE PRACTITIONER 2 1,096 $2,740,000 $2,500 premium 5.8%
That's the top 5 of 18 groups. The platform ranks the whole market — code baskets, benchmarks, and the full ranked list. the full ranking is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →