NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Market snapshot

Nationwide CY2024

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
Q5122 Injection, pegfilgrastim-apgf (nyvepria), biosimilar, 0.5 mg HCPCS · Treatment
Classification Treatment Injections and Infusions (nononcologic) Injection - Colony Stimulating Factors (CMS RBCS)
First observed 2021
National scale 21,968 services ▼ 81.4% YoY · 993 beneficiaries (CY2024, Medicare FFS)
Medicare paid $1.3M · $57.46 avg / service, national
CMS descriptor · RBCS classification · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims, 12-year window
Billing groups

19

Named groups billing this code
Named-group all-Medicare svcs · est.

36,700

Scaled from 19,814 observed FFS services.
FFS of Medicare

49%

Payer-mix frame
Services · year over year
Services YoY

-81.3%

All-Medicare est. · observed FFS -81.4%
Volume, not care. A shrinking fee-for-service denominator is not a shrinking market.
Estimated all-Medicare volume estimate
FFS + estimated MA

~36,700 services

19,814 observed fee-for-service (54%) · ~16,886 estimated Medicare Advantage.

Scaled from the observed floor by each state’s fee-for-service share (FFS share as of 2024) — scaled estimate — assumes MA utilization mirrors FFS; not an observation. How we scale
Top states — Q5122 (CY2024)

Disclosed Medicare fee-for-service services by billing state; open a bar for that state's ranked market.

Billed → allowed → paid
Named-group submitted charges
$16.1M
Named-group allowed amount
$1.4M
Named-group Medicare payments
$1.1M
Avg charge / svc
$813
Avg allowed / svc
$72
Avg payment / svc
$57
Totals are named-group (attributable) sums. Allowed is Medicare’s fee-schedule recognized price — what CMS recognizes, before the 80% Medicare pays.
Average charge per group
$0 19 groups · avg submitted charge / service $879
Market analyticsPlatform Methods →

Search a single state to see that market's full analytics — the free tier previews every panel, gated.

Or just look at it: nuclear heart imaging (78452) in Arizona is open as a live example — the full paid view, real data.

View the live example →
Unlock the Platform — the full read, every number below, code baskets, and export. Looking is free; the depth is paid. Notify me at launch →
Refine: group size any 5+ locked column25+ locked column100+ locked column independent only locked column
Filter results:

Email me this CSV

Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022 locked column CY2021 locked column CY2020 locked column
Physician groups ranked by Q5122 services, highest first, CY2024
# Physician group locked column City locked column St locked column Specialty locked column Providers locked column Q5122 svcs Submitted charges locked column Avg charge locked column Medicare $ locked column Share of state* locked column Phone
1 ILLINOIS CANCER SPECIALISTS ARLINGTON HEIGHTS IL HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY 29 6,198 $5,109,792 $824 premium 100.0% (847) 259-4482
2 MARYLAND ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY PA LAUREL MD HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY 99 2,460 $2,162,340 $879 premium 100.0% (301) 982-9800
3 MINNESOTA ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY PA EDINA MN PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 135 1,776 $1,561,104 $879 premium 74.0% (952) 928-2900
4 VIRGINIA ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES NORFOLK VA PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 123 1,500 $1,318,500 $879 premium 46.8%
5 SOUTH CAROLINA ONCOLOGY ASSOC PA COLUMBIA SC HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY 18 1,320 $777,480 $589 premium 39.7% (803) 461-3000
That's the top 5 of 19 groups. The platform ranks the whole market — code baskets, benchmarks, and the full ranked list. the full ranking is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →

*Share of the state's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for the primary code, counted once per clinician. "St" is the state the volume was billed from: a group appears in each state where its clinicians bill Medicare, with that state's volume and share ("City" is the group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group, so shares reflect attributable volume. See Methods.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →