Who bills the most Biopsy of lining of uterus and/or removal of polyp using an endoscope (58558) to Medicare in Tennessee?
Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS3 physician groups billed Biopsy of lining of uterus and/or removal of polyp using an endoscope (58558) to Medicare fee-for-service in Tennessee in 2024; independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 0%.
58558 — Biopsy of lining of uterus and/or removal of polyp using an endoscope · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.
Snapshot covers the whole Tennessee market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).
Medicare fee-for-service covers 47% of Medicare in Tennessee; Medicare Advantage penetration 42% → 53% since 2020.
| # | Physician group | City | St | Specialty | Providers | 58558 svcs | Share* | Phone |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ADVANCED DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING PC | NASHVILLE | TN | NURSE PRACTITIONER | 534 | 24 | 12.7% | (615) 612-2146 |
| 2 | KINGMAN HEALTHCARE INC | KINGMAN | TN | DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY | 178 | 12 | 6.3% | (928) 263-4722 |
| 3 | MCDONALD MURRMANN CENTER FOR WOMENS HEALTH | GERMANTOWN | TN | NURSE PRACTITIONER | 6 | 11 | 5.8% | (901) 752-4000 |
*Share of Tennessee's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for 58558, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing 58558 in Tennessee — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.
How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.
Comparing against an all-payer estimate?
These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →