NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare Arizona · CY2024

Who bills the most Chemical destruction of first incompetent vein of arm or leg using imaging guidance (36482) to Medicare in Arizona?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
15
Billing groups
2,401
Named-group FFS services
$9,228,614
Named-group submitted charges
$3,844
Avg charge / service
$1,556
Avg allowed / service
81%
Top-5 concentration
13%
Independent share

15 physician groups billed Chemical destruction of first incompetent vein of arm or leg using imaging guidance (36482) to Medicare fee-for-service in Arizona in 2024; the top five named groups hold 81% of that volume, and independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 13%.

36482 — Chemical destruction of first incompetent vein of arm or leg using imaging guidance · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole Arizona market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 49% of Medicare in Arizona; Medicare Advantage penetration 42% → 51% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers 36482 svcs Share*Phone
1 ARIZONA UVC MEDICAL PLLC PHOENIXAZGENERAL SURGERY 13 1,063 32.9% (800) 991-6117
2 LAKESIDE HEART AND VASCULAR CENTER PLLC LAKE HAVASU CITYAZNURSE PRACTITIONER 27 328 10.2% (928) 453-2727
3 VEIN ENVY LLC LITCHFIELD PARKAZPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3 321 9.9% (623) 233-1050
4 TRI-CITY CARDIOLOGY CONSULTANTS PC MESAAZCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 41 131 4.1% (480) 835-6100
5 COMPREHENSIVE INTERVENTIONAL CARE CENTERS PLLC GILBERTAZDIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 8 92 2.9% (480) 374-7354
6 PIMA HEART PHYSICIANS PC GREEN VALLEYAZNURSE PRACTITIONER 65 89 2.8% (520) 838-3540
7 CENTER FOR VEIN RESTORATION AZ LLC GILBERTAZCARDIAC SURGERY 4 88 2.7% (855) 830-8346
8 HEART AND VASCULAR ASSOCIATES LLC SIERRA VISTAAZCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 5 75 2.3% (520) 335-2400
9 REGENCY RECONSTRUCTION PLLC PHOENIXAZPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 6 47 1.5% (623) 243-9077
10 SWARUP LLC PHOENIXAZCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 5 39 1.2% (602) 456-2342
11 CARDIOVASCULAR ASSOCIATES OF MESA PC MESAAZINTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY 12 35 1.1% (480) 641-5400
12 USA VEIN CLINICS OF PHOENIX PLLC PHOENIXAZGENERAL SURGERY 2 27 0.8% (602) 734-4405
13 RED SEA HEART CENTER PLC YUMAAZNURSE PRACTITIONER 3 24 0.7% (928) 344-9300
14 SUNSTATE CARDIOLOGY PC CHANDLERAZCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 7 23 0.7% (480) 821-3800
15 EAST VALLEY CARDIOLOGY LTD CHANDLERAZNURSE PRACTITIONER 7 19 0.6% (480) 899-9430

*Share of Arizona's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for 36482, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing 36482 in Arizona — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →