NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare Georgia · CY2024

Who bills the most Drug test(s), definitive, utilizing (1) drug identification methods able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers (but not necessarily stereoisomers), including, but not limited to gc/ms (any type, single or tandem) and lc/ms (G0482) to Medicare in Georgia?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
11
Billing groups
3,614
Named-group FFS services
$2,197,459
Named-group submitted charges
$608
Avg charge / service
$194
Avg allowed / service
89%
Top-5 concentration
23%
Independent share

11 physician groups billed Drug test(s), definitive, utilizing (1) drug identification methods able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers (but not necessarily stereoisomers), including, but not limited to gc/ms (any type, single or tandem) and lc/ms (G0482) to Medicare fee-for-service in Georgia in 2024; the top five named groups hold 89% of that volume, and independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 23%.

G0482 — Drug test(s), definitive, utilizing (1) drug identification methods able to identify individual drugs and distinguish between structural isomers (but not necessarily stereoisomers), including, but not limited to gc/ms (any type, single or tandem) and lc/ms · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole Georgia market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 45% of Medicare in Georgia; Medicare Advantage penetration 43% → 55% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers G0482 svcs Share*Phone
1 INTERVENTIONAL SPINE AND PAIN MANAGEMENT CENTER PC CONYERSGAPAIN MANAGEMENT 51 1,884 14.3% (770) 929-9033
2 SOUTHEAST REGIONAL PAIN CTR PC ColumbusGAPAIN MANAGEMENT 2 843 6.4%
3 PAIN CARE LLC STOCKBRIDGEGAANESTHESIOLOGY 8 260 2.0% (770) 960-2701
4 CENTER FOR SPINE AND PAIN MEDICINE PC DALTONGAPAIN MANAGEMENT 4 133 1.0% (706) 279-2635
5 CENTURION ANESTHESIA - FL LLC HOLLYWOODGACERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) 43 113 0.9% (917) 681-4963
6 CENTER FOR SPINE INTERVENTIONS, PC ACWORTHGAANESTHESIOLOGY 3 82 0.6% 6788132741103
7 GEORGIA PAIN AND WELLNESS CENTER LAWRENCEVILLEGAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 52 81 0.6% (770) 962-3642
8 PRIVIA MEDICAL GROUP OF GEORGIA LLC FAYETTEVILLEGANURSE PRACTITIONER 453 78 0.6%
9 NON-SURGICAL ORTHOPAEDICS PC CONYERSGAPHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION 5 75 0.6% (770) 760-9360
10 SOUTHERN INTERVENTIONAL PAIN CENTER LLC THOMASVILLEGANURSE PRACTITIONER 5 41 0.3% (229) 226-2234
11 THE NEXUS PAIN CENTER OF COLUMBUS LLC COLUMBUSGANURSE PRACTITIONER 16 24 0.2% (706) 653-7000

*Share of Georgia's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for G0482, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing G0482 in Georgia — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →