NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare Maryland · CY2024

Who bills the most Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg (J2777) to Medicare in Maryland?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
19
Billing groups
1,369,718
Named-group FFS services
$94,596,497
Named-group submitted charges
$69
Avg charge / service
$34
Avg allowed / service
75%
Top-5 concentration
3%
Independent share

19 physician groups billed Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg (J2777) to Medicare fee-for-service in Maryland in 2024; the top five named groups hold 75% of that volume, and independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 3%.

J2777 — Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole Maryland market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 75% of Medicare in Maryland; Medicare Advantage penetration 13% → 25% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers J2777 svcs Share*Phone
1 THE RETINA GROUP OF WASHINGTON PLLC WASHINGTONMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 80 261,540 15.4% (202) 331-1188
2 ELMAN RETINA GROUP PA BALTIMOREMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 4 218,520 12.8% (410) 686-3000
3 CUMBERLAND VALLEY RETINA CONSULTANTS PC HAGERSTOWNMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 5 210,120 12.3% 30166517121027
4 RETINA CONSULTANTS OF DELMARVA PA MILFORDMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 4 172,441 10.1% (302) 491-4497
5 THOMPSON AND SJAARDA PA FREDERICKMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 3 170,946 10.0% (301) 682-9700
6 ROBERT E PARNES MD LLC HAGERSTOWNMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 3 144,783 8.5% (301) 671-2400
7 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY BALTIMOREMDNURSE PRACTITIONER 2900 41,340 2.4% (410) 502-4340
8 RETINA CONSULTANTS OF CAROLINA, PA GREENVILLEMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 11 38,040 2.2% (864) 233-5722
9 OMAR F. AHMAD, M.D., P.C. WALDORFMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 2 27,360 1.6% (301) 893-3484
10 CHESAPEAKE EYE CARE AND LASER CENTER LLC ANNAPOLISMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 78 25,740 1.5% (410) 571-8733
11 RETINA CONSULTANTS PC MANCHESTERMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 7 14,940 0.9% (860) 646-7704
12 PENINSULA EYE CENTER PA SALISBURYMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 6 12,421 0.7% 4107499290105
13 KATZEN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES PC LUTHERVILLEMDOPTOMETRY 25 6,783 0.4% (410) 821-9490
14 UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND EYE ASSOCIATES, P.A. BALTIMOREMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 24 6,001 0.4% (667) 214-1111
15 CAPITAL EYE CARE LLC WASHINGTONMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 12 5,400 0.3% (202) 833-1668
16 FARHAD NASEH MD PA GAITHERSBURGMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 3 3,862 0.2% (301) 840-2208
17 ASSOCIATED RETINAL CONSULTANTS LLC TEANECKMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 115 3,660 0.2% (201) 837-7300
18 WASHINGTON EYE PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PC CHEVY CHASEMDOPHTHALMOLOGY 9 3,300 0.2% (301) 657-5700
19 SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE, INC BALTIMOREMDPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 386 2,521 0.1%

*Share of Maryland's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for J2777, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing J2777 in Maryland — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →