NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare Texas · CY2024

Who bills the most Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg (J1439) to Medicare in Texas?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
16
Billing groups
1,471,401
Named-group FFS services
$4,868,157
Named-group submitted charges
$3
Avg charge / service
$1
Avg allowed / service
76%
Top-5 concentration
0%
Independent share

16 physician groups billed Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg (J1439) to Medicare fee-for-service in Texas in 2024; the top five named groups hold 76% of that volume, and independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 0%.

J1439 — Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole Texas market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 46% of Medicare in Texas; Medicare Advantage penetration 43% → 54% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers J1439 svcs Share*Phone
1 ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY CONSULTANTS, PA FORT WORTHTXHEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY 69 417,000 19.5% (817) 759-7000
2 TEXAS ONCOLOGY PA DALLASTXPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 995 261,750 12.3%
3 BRAZOS VALLEY HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES PA COLLEGE STATIONTXHEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY 6 202,000 9.5% (979) 776-2000
4 SOUTH TEXAS ONCOLOGY AND HEMATOLOGY, PLLC SAN ANTONIOTXHEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY 39 134,250 6.3% (210) 593-5700
5 MEDICAL CLINIC OF HOUSTON, LLP HOUSTONTXINTERNAL MEDICINE 65 99,000 4.6% (713) 526-5511
6 INNOVATIVE INFUSIONS LLC AUSTINTXNURSE PRACTITIONER 106 92,400 4.3% (512) 261-4800
7 WEST TEXAS DIGESTIVE DISEASE CENTER P.A. LUBBOCKTXCERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) 10 69,750 3.3% (806) 788-4368
8 KELLUM PHYSICIAN PARTNERS PA SCHERTZTXPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 17 39,750 1.9% (210) 945-2121
9 BSA AMARILLO DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC INC AMARILLOTXNURSE PRACTITIONER 31 35,250 1.7% (806) 358-0200
10 ADVANCED INFUSION SERVICES LLC AMARILLOTXFAMILY PRACTICE 2 24,750 1.2% (806) 242-2272
11 OKLAHOMA CANCER SPECIALISTS AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LLC TULSATXNURSE PRACTITIONER 47 18,750 0.9% (918) 505-3200
12 ONCOLOGY CONSULTANTS, P.A. HOUSTONTXMEDICAL ONCOLOGY 34 18,000 0.8% (281) 481-6688
13 UNIFIED WOMENS HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS PLLC MCKINNEYTXOBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY 184 18,000 0.8% (972) 542-8884
14 PREMIER ONCOLOGY CONSULTANTS PA HOUSTONTXMEDICAL ONCOLOGY 2 15,000 0.7% (281) 647-7766
15 DR. ROGERS MEDICAL GROUP PA SAN ANTONIOTXPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 7 13,251 0.6%
16 UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS DALLASTXPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 3200 12,500 0.6% (214) 633-5555

*Share of Texas's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for J1439, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing J1439 in Texas — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →