NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare Connecticut · CY2024

Who bills the most Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit (J0585) to Medicare in Connecticut?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
15
Billing groups
433,203
Named-group FFS services
$6,761,269
Named-group submitted charges
$16
Avg charge / service
$6
Avg allowed / service
85%
Top-5 concentration
0%
Independent share

15 physician groups billed Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit (J0585) to Medicare fee-for-service in Connecticut in 2024; the top five named groups hold 85% of that volume, and independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 0%.

J0585 — Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole Connecticut market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 43% of Medicare in Connecticut; Medicare Advantage penetration 45% → 57% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers J0585 svcs Share*Phone
1 HARTFORD HEALTHCARE MEDICAL GROUP SPECIALISTS PLLC STORRSCTPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1493 169,373 26.6% (860) 724-2579
2 NUVANCE HEALTH MEDICAL PRACTICE CT INC DANBURYCTPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 748 86,831 13.6% (203) 739-7118
3 TRINITY HEALTH OF NEW ENGLAND PROVIDER NETWORK ORGANIZATION INC HARTFORDCTPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 591 53,000 8.3% (860) 714-3500
4 YALE UNIVERSITY NEW HAVENCTPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 2649 35,505 5.6% (203) 688-4242
5 NORTHEAST MEDICAL GROUP INC NEW HAVENCTPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1380 24,646 3.9%
6 UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER FARMINGTONCTNURSE PRACTITIONER 630 17,200 2.7% (860) 679-3692
7 CONNECTICUT EYE CONSULTANTS PC DANBURYCTOPHTHALMOLOGY 16 13,115 2.1% (203) 791-2020
8 WHITE PLAINS PHYSICIAN SERVICES PC WHITE PLAINSCTPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 383 7,900 1.2% (914) 681-0600
9 THE EYE CARE GROUP, P.C. WATERBURYCTOPHTHALMOLOGY 16 6,123 1.0% (203) 573-4849
10 STAMFORD HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP INC STAMFORDCTPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 419 5,900 0.9% (203) 276-4644
11 PROSPECT CT MEDICAL FOUNDATION INC MANCHESTERCTINTERNAL MEDICINE 294 3,700 0.6% (860) 649-7557
12 MHS PRIMARY CARE, INC. MIDDLETOWNCTPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 179 3,500 0.5%
13 CONNECTICUT EAR NOSE AND THROAT SINUS AND ALLERGY SPECIALISTS PC WATERBURYCTOTOLARYNGOLOGY 6 2,210 0.3% (203) 574-3777
14 MANCHESTER UROLOGY ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION MANCHESTERCTUROLOGY 25 2,100 0.3% (603) 836-1590
15 SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP PA BERKELEY HEIGHTSCTPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1183 2,100 0.3% (908) 273-4300

*Share of Connecticut's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for J0585, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing J0585 in Connecticut — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →