NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare North Dakota · CY2024

Who bills the most Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml (Q9967) to Medicare in North Dakota?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
5
Billing groups
39,874
Named-group FFS services
$90,384
Named-group submitted charges
$2
Avg charge / service
$0
Avg allowed / service
Top-5 concentration
0%
Independent share

5 physician groups billed Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml (Q9967) to Medicare fee-for-service in North Dakota in 2024; independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 0%.

Q9967 — Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole North Dakota market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 64% of Medicare in North Dakota; Medicare Advantage penetration 20% → 36% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers Q9967 svcs Share*Phone
1 SANFORD BISMARCK BISMARCKNDNURSE PRACTITIONER 563 16,220 22.1% (701) 323-8300
2 INNOVIS HEALTH LLC FARGONDNURSE PRACTITIONER 565 13,900 18.9% (701) 364-6600
3 SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER FARGO FARGONDNURSE PRACTITIONER 1198 6,569 8.9% (701) 234-2000
4 TRINITY HEALTH MINOTNDNURSE PRACTITIONER 296 1,765 2.4% (701) 418-8000
5 BISMARCK CANCER CENTER BISMARCKNDRADIATION ONCOLOGY 5 1,420 1.9% (701) 222-6100

*Share of North Dakota's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for Q9967, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing Q9967 in North Dakota — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →