NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare South Carolina · CY2024

Who bills the most Nuclear medicine studies of blood flow in heart muscle at rest and with stress with concurrent ct scan (78431) to Medicare in South Carolina?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
2
Billing groups
688
Named-group FFS services
$3,182,350
Named-group submitted charges
$4,626
Avg charge / service
$2,187
Avg allowed / service
Top-5 concentration
0%
Independent share

2 physician groups billed Nuclear medicine studies of blood flow in heart muscle at rest and with stress with concurrent ct scan (78431) to Medicare fee-for-service in South Carolina in 2024; independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 0%.

78431 — Nuclear medicine studies of blood flow in heart muscle at rest and with stress with concurrent ct scan · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole South Carolina market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 54% of Medicare in South Carolina; Medicare Advantage penetration 33% → 46% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers 78431 svcs Share*Phone
1 CAROLINA CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES LLC ROCK HILLSCCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 16 677 96.9% (803) 324-5130
2 BON SECOURS MEDICAL GROUP GREENVILLE SPECIALTY CARE LLC GREENVILLESCNURSE PRACTITIONER 288 11 1.6% (864) 255-1901

*Share of South Carolina's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for 78431, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing 78431 in South Carolina — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →