NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare Virginia · CY2024

Who bills the most Removal of external hemorrhoids by rubber banding (46221) to Medicare in Virginia?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
14
Billing groups
759
Named-group FFS services
$529,581
Named-group submitted charges
$698
Avg charge / service
$279
Avg allowed / service
70%
Top-5 concentration
0%
Independent share

14 physician groups billed Removal of external hemorrhoids by rubber banding (46221) to Medicare fee-for-service in Virginia in 2024; the top five named groups hold 70% of that volume, and independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 0%.

46221 — Removal of external hemorrhoids by rubber banding · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole Virginia market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 61% of Medicare in Virginia; Medicare Advantage penetration 25% → 39% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers 46221 svcs Share*Phone
1 CAPITAL DIGESTIVE CARE LLC WASHINGTONVAGASTROENTEROLOGY 238 200 16.6% (202) 296-3449
2 WINCHESTER GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES WINCHESTERVAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 15 107 8.9% 5406671244234
3 FAIRFAX COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY PC FAIRFAXVACOLORECTAL SURGERY (PROCTOLOGY) 12 96 8.0% (703) 280-2841
4 VIRGINIA HOSPITAL CENTER PHYSICIAN GROUP LLC ARLINGTONVANURSE PRACTITIONER 345 72 6.0%
5 COLON AND RECTAL SPECIALISTS LTD MECHANICSVILLEVACOLORECTAL SURGERY (PROCTOLOGY) 10 53 4.4% (804) 559-3400
6 SENTARA MEDICAL GROUP NORFOLKVAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 1404 43 3.6%
7 INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES FALLS CHURCHVANURSE PRACTITIONER 1818 43 3.6%
8 GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOC OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC. LYNCHBURGVAANESTHESIOLOGY 24 41 3.4% 4343841862643
9 MARY WASHINGTON HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS LLC FREDERICKSBURGVADIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 267 25 2.1% (540) 741-5610
10 CAMC GREENBRIER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER INC RONCEVERTEVAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 78 19 1.6%
11 BAYVIEW PHYSICIAN SERVICES PC CHESAPEAKEVAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 322 18 1.5% (757) 410-4488
12 MARTHA JEFFERSON MEDICAL GROUP LLC CHARLOTTESVILLEVAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 192 16 1.3% (434) 817-1020
13 VALLEY PHYSICIAN ENTERPRISE INC WINCHESTERVAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 229 13 1.1% (540) 536-8000
14 COLUMBIA HEALTHCARE OF CENTRAL VIRGINIA INC NORTH CHESTERFIELDVAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 30 13 1.1% (804) 716-5520

*Share of Virginia's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for 46221, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing 46221 in Virginia — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →