NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare California · CY2024

Who bills the most Removal of plaque and insertion of stents in arteries of leg (37227) to Medicare in California?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
16
Billing groups
705
Named-group FFS services
$25,334,821
Named-group submitted charges
$35,936
Avg charge / service
$5,989
Avg allowed / service
69%
Top-5 concentration
0%
Independent share

16 physician groups billed Removal of plaque and insertion of stents in arteries of leg (37227) to Medicare fee-for-service in California in 2024; the top five named groups hold 69% of that volume, and independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 0%.

37227 — Removal of plaque and insertion of stents in arteries of leg · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole California market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 49% of Medicare in California; Medicare Advantage penetration 45% → 51% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers 37227 svcs Share*Phone
1 BASS MEDICAL GROUP WALNUT CREEKCAOTOLARYNGOLOGY 318 232 15.5%
2 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY VASCULAR GROUP A MEDICAL CORPORATION WEST HILLSCAVASCULAR SURGERY 4 92 6.2% (818) 345-6126
3 POLYXENE GAZETAS KOKINOS MD PC CAMPBELLCAVASCULAR SURGERY 5 56 3.8% (408) 376-3626
4 EMPIRE VEIN AND VASCULAR SPECIALISTS RANCHO MIRAGECAVASCULAR SURGERY 6 55 3.7% 76056834613
5 ORANGE COUNTY VASCULAR SPECIALISTS, INC. NEWPORT BEACHCAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 2 48 3.2% (949) 574-7176
6 SPEARMAN MD INC ARROYO GRANDECADIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 2 37 2.5% (805) 473-8346
7 FARSHAD MALEKMEHR MD INC ENCINOCACARDIAC SURGERY 2 31 2.1% (818) 908-9752
8 EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER RANCHO MIRAGECANURSE PRACTITIONER 457 27 1.8% (760) 340-3911
9 MISSION SURGICAL CLINIC INC CORONACAVASCULAR SURGERY 5 21 1.4% (951) 278-8870
10 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL SOLUTIONS MEDICAL CORPORATION SAN JOSECAINTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY 5 20 1.3% (408) 918-0405
11 MONTEREY BAY VASCULAR INC APTOSCAGENERAL SURGERY 3 19 1.3% (831) 318-0010
12 JERRY KIM MD INC POMONACAVASCULAR SURGERY 3 18 1.2% (909) 973-1148
13 PACIFIC CARDIOVASCULAR AND VEIN INSTITUTE INC OXNARDCAPHYSICIAN ASSISTANT 5 14 0.9% (805) 643-3330
14 STOCKTON CARDIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP COMPLETE HEART CARE INC STOCKTONCACARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) 14 12 0.8%
15 KEVIN M CASEY MD APMC SANTA BARBARACAVASCULAR SURGERY 4 12 0.8% 8054568890127
16 STANFORD HEALTH CARE STANFORDCADIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY 3039 11 0.7% (650) 723-4000

*Share of California's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for 37227, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing 37227 in California — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →