NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence
+ Build a code basket
Medicare New York · CY2024

Who bills the most Therapy procedure for a range of mental processes, initial 15 minutes (97129) to Medicare in New York?

Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
11
Billing groups
10,164
Named-group FFS services
$560,356
Named-group submitted charges
$55
Avg charge / service
$24
Avg allowed / service
92%
Top-5 concentration
99%
Independent share

11 physician groups billed Therapy procedure for a range of mental processes, initial 15 minutes (97129) to Medicare fee-for-service in New York in 2024; the top five named groups hold 92% of that volume, and independent (non-hospital-affiliated) groups deliver 99%.

97129 — Therapy procedure for a range of mental processes, initial 15 minutes · Source: CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners PUF (Part B), CY2024 release. Medicare fee-for-service only.

Snapshot covers the whole New York market — the table below shows the top 100 groups (free tier).

Payer-mix context

Medicare fee-for-service covers 47% of Medicare in New York; Medicare Advantage penetration 44% → 53% since 2020.

Market structure — concentration, independent share, and the consolidation trend for this market — is part of the market analytics platform — built, not launched yet. Notify me at launch →
#Physician groupCityStSpecialty Providers 97129 svcs Share*Phone
1 FOX REHABILITATION PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICES LLC NEW YORKNYPHYSICAL THERAPIST IN PRIVATE PRACTICE 230 6,192 32.3% (877) 407-3422
2 COMPLETE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY PC ROCKVILLE CENTRENYCLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST 2 1,779 9.3% (516) 696-8401
3 AFFINITY REHABILITATION LLP MOUNT VERNONNYPHYSICAL THERAPIST IN PRIVATE PRACTICE 112 475 2.5% (914) 266-3796
4 PT AND OT FOR SENIOR REHAB AT HOME PLLC BROOKLYNNYPHYSICAL THERAPIST IN PRIVATE PRACTICE 78 433 2.3% (914) 837-6538
5 LINK HOME THERAPY SERVICES OF NY-PT OT SLP PLLC VALLEY STREAMNYOCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST IN PRIVATE PRACTICE 43 429 2.2% (718) 650-6230
6 FOX REHABILITATION SERVICES INC PLEASANTVILLENYPHYSICAL THERAPIST IN PRIVATE PRACTICE 1227 427 2.2% (877) 407-3422
7 METRO PHYSICAL OCCUPATIONAL SPEECH MASSAGE THERAPY AND ACUPUNCTURE PLL GARDEN CITYNYPHYSICAL THERAPIST IN PRIVATE PRACTICE 461 193 1.0% (516) 745-8070
8 FOX REHABILITATION SERVICES LLC CHANTILLYNYPHYSICAL THERAPIST IN PRIVATE PRACTICE 298 88 0.5% (703) 810-3992
9 AVANT-GARDE PSYCHIATRIC CONSULTING PLLC BROOKLYNNYNURSE PRACTITIONER 5 72 0.4% (929) 617-8635
10 AT HOME BY ENHANCE THERAPIES LLC HACKENSACKNYPHYSICAL THERAPIST IN PRIVATE PRACTICE 147 58 0.3% (732) 987-3833
11 PSYCHOLOGY YME PC BROOKLYNNYCLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST 2 18 0.1% (347) 866-6573

*Share of New York's disclosed Medicare-FFS services for 97129, counted once per clinician. Volume is placed in the state it was billed from, so this page ranks the groups actually billing 97129 in New York — including groups registered elsewhere ("City" is each group's registered location). Group figures sum clinicians affiliated with exactly one group; clinicians in several groups are listed in each group's drill-down but not volume-attributed to any single group.

How to read this. Figures are Medicare fee-for-service only — not all-payer — from the CMS Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners Public Use File (Part B), CY2024 release. CMS suppresses any provider×code row under 11 beneficiaries, so a missing group means "suppressed," never zero. "Charges" are provider-submitted amounts, not payments. Groups are ranked by measured service volume attributed to clinicians in exactly one group — clinicians affiliated with several groups are listed in rosters but never volume-attributed to a single group — a direct read of the public record, not a rating or quality score. Full method: Methods & Sources.

Comparing against an all-payer estimate?

These are exact counts from Medicare fee-for-service claims — roughly a third to half of most procedure markets, depending on payer mix. Modeled all-payer databases project the remainder statistically; we publish the audited floor and label it as such. Same market, different denominator. How the numbers reconcile →