NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence

← back to results

RINGPFEIL ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY PC

PAC 8022015486 Provider group
DERMATOLOGY · HAVERFORD, PA · independent
Specialty DERMATOLOGY — most common member specialty (multi-specialty groups carry one label; see Methods)
Footprint Registered in HAVERFORD, PA · bills Medicare in 4 states (MD, NJ, PA, RI)
Scale 13 providers on the CMS registry roster · 24 codes billed (five-year data window) · 7,629 services (all billed codes, CY2024)
Medicare paid $418K · across all billed codes, CY2024, attributed & disclosed
Affiliation Independent — no hospital affiliation on record for the group's members in the CMS registry
Contact (610) 525-5250 — CMS registry listing
CMS Doctors & Clinicians registry · Medicare Part B physician/supplier claims · figures are attributed (single-group clinicians) and disclosed fee-for-service — a subset, never complete totals · group series shown over the most recent 5 years (rosters archived from 2019)
Group analytics

Who's billing in this group, plus the paid volume analytics · CY2024

Clinician makeup · CY2024
Physicians 8Advanced-practice 3Other clinicians 0= 11 clinicians billed · CY2024
By clinician headcount, CY2024. 'Physician' follows Medicare's §1861(r) definition (MD/DO, podiatry, optometry, dental medicine, chiropractic); facility and supplier enrollments are not counted as clinicians. These 11 are the clinicians who billed in CY2024 — a subset of the all-time registry roster shown on the group's identity card.

Billed 15 of the group's 24 codes this year, across 2 states (CY2024).

The full analytics for this group

Premium

The billed-volume rank, trajectory, and economics behind this group — computed on the same disclosed Medicare Part B data.

What Medicare paid this group in CY2024 is on the group's identity card — free, on every tier. Premium breaks that figure down per code and per service, and puts the volume behind it in national and peer context.

  • Per-code payment breakdown & avg $/service — dollars behind the volume
  • Beneficiary-episode volume — reach, not just service counts
  • Office vs. facility setting mix — place-of-service code split
  • National billed-volume rank — percentile, cohort & year disclosed
  • Size-peer billed-volume benchmark — vs. groups of similar size
  • Top-3 clinician share — how volume distributes
  • 5-year volume trend — direction across the window
  • Business mix — largest codes by payment

Rank and benchmark figures are billed-volume positions among peers, not measures of care. All figures attributed (single-group clinicians) and disclosed Medicare Part B fee-for-service.

Notify me at launch → Or see a live example group page →
Medicare Part B FFS · CY2024 · as published by CMS
Data year: CY2024 CY2023 CY2022  CY2021  CY2020 

Provider volumes, all codes · CY2024

NPIProviderCredentialsTypeCitySt Services (all codes)
1063632461 Neustadter, Jason M.D. Dermatology PhiladelphiaPA
1255593422 Abraham, Nina MD Dermatology HaverfordPA
1902291164 Dorfman, Claire DO Dermatology AllentownPA
1760471619 Ringpfeil, Franziska MD Dermatology HaverfordPA
1598111254 Klein, Alyssa MD Dermatology HaverfordPA
1073977146 Hallock, Katherine Dermatology PhiladelphiaPA
1942664628 Milchak, Marissa M.D. Dermatology PhiladelphiaPA
1710529979 Beers, Breean PA-C Physician Assistant HaverfordPA
1346834868 Powers, Kate PA-C Physician Assistant MarltonNJ
1174147698 Braun, Kyra PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT Physician Assistant PhiladelphiaPA
1366837395 Krausz, Aimee · member of 4 groups M.D. Dermatology PhiladelphiaPA

Volumes are attributed to a group only for clinicians affiliated with exactly one group. Clinicians in several groups are listed ("member of N groups") but shown as "—" — their volume is not attributed to any single group. A "—" on a single-group clinician means CMS suppressed the figure (fewer than 11 beneficiaries), never zero. Beneficiary-episodes count CMS's per-setting beneficiary figures, not unique patients. Average Medicare payment is the amount Medicare actually paid per service, weighted by service volume across office and facility settings. Where the roster is a single clinician, that clinician's service counts match the group's attributed volume shown on the ranked results, so they are shown here; the per-provider split across a larger roster is a premium feature. See Methods & Sources.