NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence

Medicare's chest X-ray record fell about a third — but most of that is Medicare Advantage, not fewer X-rays

Published Jul 2026 · CMS Part B PUF 📋 Cite See the data →
Diagnostic chest X-rays: fee-for-service record vs. all-Medicare estimate · 2015–2024
201520162017201820192020202120222023202438.7 million19.1 millionAll Medicare (est.)Fee-for-service
Diagnostic chest X-rays, 2015–2024: the observed Medicare fee-for-service count (lower line) against the all-Medicare estimate (upper line). Full method below.
Where the decline landed, state by state
20192024WY: 349 → 272VT: 350 → 317NM: 452 → 341AK: 470 → 347OR: 494 → 375IA: 587 → 423ID: 536 → 433UT: 497 → 436ME: 539 → 446DE: 462 → 478SD: 655 → 480ND: 703 → 492AZ: 668 → 495NH: 530 → 496SC: 708 → 500IN: 744 → 533WA: 622 → 545KY: 828 → 549KS: 742 → 551VA: 747 → 590WI: 736 → 602HI: 747 → 614CO: 727 → 653NE: 774 → 656PA: 833 → 658NJ: 715 → 659NV: 924 → 661CA: 752 → 672FL: 860 → 676MA: 764 → 678GA: 838 → 680MI: 838 → 683OH: 810 → 687OK: 899 → 733WV: 963 → 737IL: 763 → 739NC: 818 → 739MS: 988 → 766TX: 945 → 780AR: 936 → 790CT: 887 → 822NY: 939 → 825TN: 1,128 → 847AL: 1,017 → 866LA: 1,043 → 875MO: 1,037 → 894MD: 1,434 → 1,028DC: 1,577 → 1,197MT: 439 → 284RI: 954 → 1,004MN: 977 → 1,277MN 977RI 954MT 4391,277 MN1,004 RI284 MT

Between 2019 and 2024 the rate rose in 3 state markets and fell in 48, while the national rate went from 823 to 684 per 1,000 — some state markets moving far more than others.

Each line is a state: its rate per 1,000 fee-for-service beneficiaries in 2019 on the left, 2024 on the right. Rates count fee-for-service services booked to the billing state and are not scaled to total Medicare (Medicare Advantage penetration varies by state).

The fee-for-service record shows diagnostic chest X-rays down about 36% — from 30.1 million to 19.1 million. But scaled for the beneficiaries who moved to Medicare Advantage, the all-Medicare estimate fell only about 12%, and has held roughly steady since 2020.

A falling fee-for-service record is the classic Medicare-data trap. As Medicare Advantage grew from about a third of enrollment toward half over the decade, imaging shifted out of the fee-for-service file with no necessary change in the underlying care. The widening gap between the two lines is imaging that moved to Medicare Advantage, not imaging that stopped.

A real decline still sits underneath, but a smaller one. Per fee-for-service beneficiary the rate fell about 24% — from 905 to 684 per 1,000 — and it fell in nearly every state.

The all-Medicare figure is an estimate, not an observation. It assumes Medicare Advantage beneficiaries are imaged at the fee-for-service rate; the true all-payer total is not in this record.

A record of imaging volume and how its fee-for-service basis shifted — not a claim about clinical need or appropriate use, and not a claim that chest X-rays themselves fell a third.

What this is

Medicare fee-for-service diagnostic chest X-rays and the all-Medicare estimate, 2015 to 2024 — the observed record against the population-adjusted total.

What it is not

Not a claim that chest X-rays fell a third (the fee-for-service figure is inflated by the shift to Medicare Advantage), not an observation of the all-Medicare total (an estimate), and not all-payer.

How this is counted
Diagnostic chest X-rays, 2015 to 2024: the observed Medicare fee-for-service count and the all-Medicare estimate — the fee-for-service rate scaled to the whole Medicare population, which ASSUMES Medicare Advantage beneficiaries are imaged at the fee-for-service rate, so it is an estimate, not an observation. The gap between the lines is imaging that moved to Medicare Advantage. Old and new view-count codes are pooled across the 2018 recode so the series is continuous; ribs, sternum, and portable/mobile transport codes are excluded. A per-1,000 fee-for-service rate is assumption-free. Cells under 11 beneficiaries withheld by CMS. Source: Medicare Part B.