NEVVI Medicare utilization intelligence

Medicare knee arthroscopy fell by about half over the decade

Published Jul 2026 · CMS Part B PUF 📋 Cite See the data →
Medicare fee-for-service knee arthroscopies · 2015–2024 (not scaled)
2015: 99K99K20152016: 100K100K20162017: 90K90K20172018: 84K84K20182019: 76K76K20192020: 54K54K20202021: 55K55K20212022: 50K50K20222023: 44K44K20232024: 40K40K2024
Medicare fee-for-service knee-arthroscopy beneficiaries (synovectomy, abrasion, and meniscectomy codes), shown AS fee-for-service — not scaled. The per-1,000 fee-for-service rate fell about 52% over the same years — a bit less than the beneficiary count's drop, but enough to show this is a real decline in how often the procedure is done, not just the fee-for-service record shrinking as beneficiaries move to Medicare Advantage. Cells under 11 beneficiaries withheld by CMS.

This decline is real: it survives the check that dissolves most declines in this data, patients moving to private plans rather than procedures going away. Why it fell is a harder question.

Roughly 99,000 patients in traditional Medicare — the fee-for-service side, which bills Medicare directly — had a knee arthroscopy in 2015, an operation done through a small camera incision. In 2024, about 40,000 did. A drop that size normally means the denominator moved: fee-for-service has been shrinking for years as people choose private Medicare Advantage plans, so almost anything measured inside it looks like it is going away.

So take the denominator away. Per 1,000 fee-for-service patients, the rate went from about 3.0 in 2015 to about 1.4 in 2024 — a fall of roughly half, against the count's 59%. The decline is not people leaving traditional Medicare. It is the procedure being done less often.

What makes this one unusual is that the record around it is legible. Two widely covered trials — a 2002 comparison against sham surgery, a 2013 comparison against physical therapy — were published years before the volume moved, and the fall runs through the decade after. And this is where the reading has to stop. Coverage rules, referral habits, and practice patterns all shifted in the same window, and any of them could plausibly matter. The record measures the volume, not the reason.

What it does measure, it measures in a particular unit: a patient on a claim code, not an operation. Several arthroscopy codes are counted here and a patient counts once on each, so one session billing two of them shows up twice — which lifts the level in every year alike and leaves the trend where it was. On that unit, a common operation lost about half its rate in ten years, and about 40,000 traditional-Medicare patients still had one in 2024.

A volume record, not a verdict on the operation — this page compares no outcomes and grades no decision.

What this is

Medicare fee-for-service knee-arthroscopy beneficiaries, 2015 to 2024, with the assumption-free per-1,000 rate.

What it is not

Not a statement of why the volume fell, and not a claim about whether the procedure is right for any patient — a volume record only. Beneficiary counts are per code, so a patient billed under more than one arthroscopy code in a session can count more than once. Not all-payer, and not scaled to total Medicare. The per-1,000 rate is assumption-free.

How this is counted
Medicare fee-for-service knee arthroscopy, 2015 to 2024: beneficiary counts on the synovectomy, abrasion, and meniscectomy codes, shown AS fee-for-service and not scaled to total Medicare. Alongside the count runs the assumption-free per-1,000 fee-for-service rate, which fell about 52% (from roughly 3.0 to 1.4 per 1,000) over the same years — so the decline is real, not merely the fee-for-service record shrinking as beneficiaries move to Medicare Advantage. Beneficiary counts are per code, so a patient billed under more than one arthroscopy code in a session can count more than once. Cells under 11 beneficiaries withheld by CMS. Source: Medicare Part B.